Livros aleatórios da biblioteca de Doug1943
The Left in Europe Since 1789 por David Caute
The Venona Secrets: Exposing America's Cold War Traitors por Herb Romerstein
The Specter of Communism: The United States and the Origins of the Cold War, 1917-1953 (A Critical Issue) por Melvyn P. Leffler
A People's Tragedy: The Russian Revolution: 1891-1924 por Orlando Figes
The Tragedy of American Diplomacy por William Appleman Williams
The New Left: six critical essays; por Maurice William Cranston
Silent No More: Confronting America's False Images of Islam por Paul Findley
Membros com livros de Doug1943
Ligações a outros membros
amigos: ainsleytewce, alexgieg, andersoj, aquamari, argyriou, Astolfo, AsYouKnow_Bob, BeauxBooks, Belisaurus, birdistheword, brainella, brentquinn, brknhrt, BTRIPP, Carnophile, cats7051, chase.donaldson, chrestomathy, Christie, cnrenner, codyed, Cortes, cranmergirl, cutiger80, deeyork, DeputyHeadmistress, despond, dgregorybrown, docjohnb, dougarb, ElizLeone, elwood_mom, estern, ExOrienteLux, FaithAndReason, fatherz, fmcgraw, fuzzy_patters, geneg, ggchickapee, gowing, Iralell, JBenedict, jeremiahstover, jessicajames, jhale, JHLanier, jonmodene, jose.pires, jyp, kahudson, Karbie, kb1dqt, KevinCK, klorio, kmartynov, l3wilso, lastbluegirl, laubadetriste, lawecon, liamfoley, limodriver, MacShealbhaich, Madcow299, MAJGross, MartinSolomon, mattbman, MeganGrace, mercure, MikeD, MissTrudy, mjsmoose, ms529212, MuscleMeredith, muzzie, nathanm, network-janitor, NightHawk777, NoLongerAtEase, NotSunkYet, ohthatcat, oldman, OldSarge, pascal, PaulFAustin, philn, piercenb, PopeLinus, prissy, pschellhase, rawREN, Redbud, rfast10430, rkobrien, rmolter, ron_right, russelllindsey, rwcook, sergerca, stevenschmitt, susanaudrey, Syrix, taust, tcgardner, tcrutch, tedagnew, tedmag, tem209, teresee39, thinkingriddles, tikilights, tomhanna, Toolroomtrustee, TruthSeeker, turbosaab, twebonebadpig, unreconstructed, w.ar, weidners, WilliamOChee, wirkman, wlgordon, wordwanderer, WouterGil, wurldofwonder, xam, xieouyang, yams69, Zookeeper_B
bibliotecas interessantes: birdistheword, boxinghefner, cutiger80, docjohnb, ese9537, hellstrom, jfclark, JHLanier, JimThomson, jose.pires, kahudson, mschiffer, plattengr, pomonomo2003, pschellhase, Toolroomtrustee
Autores LibraryThing: Brian Clegg (brianclegg), Kathy Roth-Douquet (roth-douquet), Andrew Brown (seatrout)
Fontes RSS
Livros adicionados recentemente
Resenhas dos livros de Doug1943 não incluindo resenhas do próprio
Membro: Doug1943
ColecçõesA sua biblioteca (842), Lista de desejos (1), Todas as colecções (843)
Resenhas2 resenhas
Etiquetasto buy (69), philosophy (26), history (25), conservatism (23), poverty (18), england (17), uk (15), economics (12), biography (12), evolution (12) — ver todas as etiquetas
Nuvensnuvem de etiquetas, nuvem de autores
GruposAncient History, Books that made me think, Consilience, Development Issues, Final Frontier - Spaceflight, Historical Fiction, History at 30,000 feet: The Big Picture, HMS Surprise, I Survived the Great Vowel Shift, International Relations — mostrar todos os grupos
Sobre mimRetired lecturer in Computer Science; American living in England. Conservative (democratic, rationalist, grounded in Darwin rather than Jesus). Ex-Marxist who still finds much of value in historical materialism. Book addict. Fan of: Mary Renault, Patrick O'Brian, Larry McMurtry, Annie Proulx, Cormac McCarthy, David Lodge, Alison Lurie.
Sobre a minha bibliotecaMainly books on popular science, philosophy, history, politics.
Página pessoalhttp://liberty-resource-center.blogspot.com
Nome realDouglas
LocalizaçãoGuildford, England
Endereço de correio electrónicoDoug1943
Gmail.com
Autores favoritosNenhuma
Tipo de contapública, vitalícia
Novidades das LigaçõesNovidades das Ligações
URL
http://www.librarything.com/profile/Doug1943 (perfil)
http://www.librarything.com/catalog/Doug1943 (biblioteca)
Conhecimento ComumSéries (50), Prémios (70), Personagens (204), Lugares (72)
Membro desdeMar 21, 2006









Faça um comentário
Adira ou autentique-se para escrever um comentário.
How do you know? I met a guy on a bus once who claimed to be a tuna fish sandwich.
publicado por Makifat às 8:20 pm (EST) em Dec 8, 2009
publicado por OldSarge às 7:15 pm (EST) em Dec 8, 2009
By the way, looking down your profile page, I don't count my friend Sarge as "evil". Where the hell does he get these ideas?! ;)
publicado por Makifat às 6:32 pm (EST) em Dec 8, 2009
publicado por OldSarge às 11:02 am (EST) em Dec 3, 2009
We've been spending just under half a year in Durango each year since 2001. The master plan is eventually to relocate 100% to Durango; but family entanglements and a very sweet part time consulting gig with New York Public Library keep bringing us back each winter.
As a rough rule of thumb, from just before Memorial day (last monday in May) till just before Halloween (OCt 31), we are most likely found in Durango.
publicado por modalursine às 12:30 pm (EST) em Nov 15, 2009
There are a few of us that do teach, but most of them concentrate on the youth. Most of my students are retired and I find that they have a more developed sense of learning the basics before trying to find an area of specialization.
Roman coins. An interesting historical period for coins and the research can fill many hours. I was briefly interested in early modern German coinage (16th-18th century) but they really aren't available at reasonable prices in the States.
Phil
publicado por philn às 11:28 am (EST) em Jul 26, 2009
Sorry about the delay in getting to your friends invitation, but I've been busy with a contract. Software review is probably the most boring thing in the world, but it pays some of the bills.
Politically we may have some common ground as I'm what I describe as a Ron Paul libertarian. I've been turning my hobby, coin collecting, into an educational endeavor by teaching what some places is called an Adult Education class. I'm starting my third year at this project in September. I find that--while I never thought I'd like it--I really enjoy teaching.
Phil
publicado por philn às 3:58 pm (EST) em Jul 25, 2009
Noel Pearson is a very impressive intellect has the courage to be intellectuallv honest and capble of changing his mind if the real world behaves differently from his analysis. He has recently published a book of his speeches and op-eds 'Up from the Mission' which is very thought provoking.
On a Bill of Rights (a very dangerous idea the USA picked up from the poms) you might be interested in "Don't leave us with the Bill" the case against an Australian Bill of Rights. Although I enjoy Fish's "the Trouble with Principle".
Purely from self interest I would encourage you to deal with Proust (and then give your thoughts). I have not even got near buying the book. I am a fan of english philosophy that's if you count Popper as English.
Shot off this quick reply as I am about to go on a two week driving holiday with a friend exploring inland Far North Queensland (Dry country this time of year with many mostly relic mining towns.)
When some religous door knockers arrived at my house some time ago I explained that whilst I had my fair share of intelligence; that when spirituality was handed out I was missing. They asked me if I missed its presence. I explained that it was probably like being below par in intelligence:- people seemed to undestand things I could not understand. I never had another visit from any brand of religion. (I did look on my fence to see if there was a mark but I could not see any). Why this by-way to religion?
It is just to show empathy with your lack of that very special sense through which you appreciate cricket.
PS An early morning walk along the beach at Trinity Beach is a great experience.
Terry
publicado por taust às 2:56 am (EST) em Jul 12, 2009
I suspect we could have some interesting discussions. I am very dry economically (very worried how all the stimulus is going to be paid for before the next crisis hits in about ten years time) Socially I am liberal although not in favour of a rights approach to problem solving.
I have been a reader for life and have infected my Grandson with the same addiction. By nature non-fiction dominates. but I have been putting in the hard yards to appreciate fiction better.
Most recent book I have enjoyed was Life and Fate.
A long time ago I lived near Guidlford at Frimley.
I will not mention cricket
publicado por taust às 9:08 pm (EST) em Jul 11, 2009
Lisa
publicado por l3wilso às 12:49 am (EST) em Jul 10, 2009
Lisa
publicado por l3wilso às 12:12 am (EST) em Jul 9, 2009
publicado por sergerca às 4:47 pm (EST) em Jul 7, 2009
L
publicado por l3wilso às 6:19 pm (EST) em Jul 2, 2009
publicado por rkobrien às 9:57 pm (EST) em Jun 9, 2009
publicado por Carnophile às 6:34 pm (EST) em Jun 4, 2009
At least we now have a Marxist President and a Congress full of collectivists.
(Hey, this sentence fragment has been running though my head -
and I haven't thought of how to complete it.)
publicado por AsYouKnow_Bob às 12:18 am (EST) em May 1, 2009
Google: Eisner, Manuel Long Term Historical Trends of Violent Crime
publicado por AsYouKnow_Bob às 2:38 pm (EST) em Apr 12, 2009
videojuegosycultura.files.wordpress.com/...
(Caution: 60-page .pdf).
publicado por AsYouKnow_Bob às 2:24 pm (EST) em Apr 12, 2009
publicado por Makifat às 3:19 pm (EST) em Jan 15, 2009
My understanding was that this was to be the leitmotif of a ride in the anti-Disney themepark, "Darwinland". Unfortunately, financing evaporated in the current economic crisis....
publicado por Makifat às 3:19 pm (EST) em Jan 15, 2009
I have sent out the first 6 parts of HMS Surprise. Did they get through? Looked OK from my end, the biggest one was 11.5 MB, a tad under the 12 MB limit we have (*wipes forehead*).
Regards
Astrud
publicado por GirlFromIpanema às 3:22 pm (EST) em Dec 9, 2008
publicado por ainsleytewce às 10:02 pm (EST) em Nov 19, 2008
The Handmaid's Tale is actually my least favorite Margaret Atwood book and Oryx and Crake the next least favorite,for reasons that I will explain sometime. My favorites are The Robber Bride and The Blind Assassin.
I have been exchanging posts on the "chit-chat" section of the bookcrossing forums with some European bookcrossers who post in English and are giddy about Obama. I dread going back there, but will have to eventually. Last time one of them accused me of drinking kool-aid, which is an American expression that they evidently know that comes from the Jonestown massacre. i can't hwlp it--I am just very pessimistic about the Obama phenomenon and everything that goes with it.
publicado por ainsleytewce às 8:30 pm (EST) em Nov 19, 2008
In the context of late-Soviet-era politics of the USSR,
" the members of the Politburo who wanted to execute a coup against Gorbachev" WERE the "conservatives" -
- and the (...liberalizing...) Gorbachev WAS the "liberal".
I'm not seeing the definitional problem here.
How could you label the factions otherwise? You can't actually assert that perestroika was a "Conservative" reform of the USSR, could you?
publicado por AsYouKnow_Bob às 1:00 pm (EST) em Nov 14, 2008
Over in the "Back to normal...for now" (aka the "What is a Conservative?") thread:
I'm pretty much on board with this.
But I confess that I'm astonished that anybody can claim that the evolution and emergence of "individual liberty" in the West was in any sense at all a conservative victory - or that the opponents of what you term "civilization" are not actually today's conservatives.
One side is and has been fighting to expand political and individual liberty... and one side is fighting to slow, stop, or even reverse the expansion of "individual liberty". As true in in 1520 as it was in 1642, in 1775, in 1863, in 1965, as true as it is today.
I mean, really:
even today's conservatives have identified fundamentalist Islam as the chief thread to civilization today. And it's hard to describe Islamic fundamentalism without noting that they are, you know, rather extremely "conservative"....
Probably worth a thread of its own...
- Bob
publicado por AsYouKnow_Bob às 10:11 am (EST) em Nov 14, 2008
publicado por geneg às 7:46 am (EST) em Oct 5, 2008
publicado por geneg às 7:34 pm (EST) em Oct 4, 2008
publicado por geneg às 10:27 am (EST) em Oct 3, 2008
publicado por krolik às 3:43 am (EST) em Oct 1, 2008
publicado por markmobley às 9:24 am (EST) em Sep 24, 2008
I'd be careful with my invitations if I were you...my in-laws are in Windsor.
;)
publicado por Makifat às 4:12 pm (EST) em Jun 13, 2008
publicado por Makifat às 4:35 pm (EST) em Jun 8, 2008
I like to think of myself as an Island. Being a Republic seems like a lot of work.
publicado por Makifat às 4:32 pm (EST) em Jun 6, 2008
publicado por AsYouKnow_Bob às 8:19 am (EST) em May 1, 2008
Nicole
publicado por nperrin às 7:09 pm (EST) em Apr 18, 2008
publicado por geneg às 3:20 pm (EST) em Feb 20, 2008
Thank you.
publicado por bigal123 às 6:19 pm (EST) em Feb 17, 2008
publicado por Jesse_wiedinmyer às 4:19 am (EST) em Dec 23, 2007
But having been turned away as a child because of my beliefs, the incident still makes me smile wanly when *I'm* accused of being "bigoted against conservatives" (and/or the religious).
publicado por AsYouKnow_Bob às 2:56 pm (EST) em Dec 9, 2007
Huh. The Boy Scouts wouldn't let ME join.
publicado por AsYouKnow_Bob às 11:16 am (EST) em Dec 9, 2007
Doug, there really doesn't seem to be any end to your hidden depths.
- Bob
publicado por AsYouKnow_Bob às 7:26 pm (EST) em Nov 27, 2007
publicado por ainsleytewce às 2:09 pm (EST) em Nov 4, 2007
I've been casting around on the internet the past couple of days to see any discussions on the death of Paul Tibbets, who died recently. One of our local papers, the Seattle Times, mentioned him on the front page, but the other, The Seattle Post-Intelligencer, didn't seem to mention him at all, at least not on that day. As you probably know, he was one of the pilots who flew the plane that dropped one of the bombs on Japan that ended World War II. At least that's what most of us used to think. There has been a lot of spin, in schools, the media, etc. to create a moral equavalency between us and the Japanese now, apparently. I suppose next will be spin to create moral equivalency between us and the Nazis. But nearly all World War II generation people I know beleive the bombs were the lesser of two evils. Those people, like Paul Tibbets, are dying out.
publicado por ainsleytewce às 1:54 pm (EST) em Nov 3, 2007
publicado por lriley às 12:13 pm (EST) em Nov 3, 2007
I have been meaning to post more in the forums and groups, but frankly, came back from Guatemala and was overwhelmed with business, academic, and family issues, not to mention obscene amounts of mail and bills, etc. Ideally, I'd do something about it, but have been afflicted with a serious case of sloth at the same time. Anyhow, just wanted to tell you that the most recent New Yorker magazine has an article on Jacques Barzun, the (centenary! and still writing!) author of the bestseller "From Dawn to Decadence," and the article discusses the issue of the intersections of history and Western culture, from Barzun's point of view. Barzun, a proponent of looking at all the aspects that move the mosaics of history, including the "triffles," claims that the world wars of the 20th century were the beginning of the end, re modern Western culture, which he sees as beginning in the Renaissance. I find this an interesting melange of a more Marxist (structurally, at least) view of studying history and a quite conservative view of the importance of Western culture. He truly sees Western culture as flickering out and to him, it's a tragedy. I thought you might enjoy the article. I tried to find it online for you but wasn't able to, but I'll save the magazine and if you cannot find the magazine, I can mail it to you somewhere later on. That is, if you are interested! You might not be, but just thought I'd let you know.
publicado por MissTrudy às 12:44 am (EST) em Oct 24, 2007
Of course I enjoyed such statements as, "the utter absurdity of it all being concealed through obscure and pretentious language." This is exactly what I was getting at in the thread on Bourdieu and Heidegger.
publicado por geneg às 11:21 pm (EST) em Oct 17, 2007
publicado por MissTrudy às 7:39 pm (EST) em Oct 17, 2007
Thanks for your note! It is so nice to hear from friends these days, when I feel a bit "away from home" even though I grew up here in Guatemala. But home is never really "home," once one has left for over 20 years, so it's taken some getting used to. I would definitely love to participate in a discussion on identity. A very good friend of mine actually did his dissertation on that topic, from a moral philosophy point of view, and it was fascinating. He is really big on Charles Taylor. I will be back in the States in about a week, but let me tell you, the work ethic here is so very different. I mean, things get done, obviously, the place is a repository of beautiful sky-scrappers and the cellphone system is better than in the USA, but things get done in such a way that for us, used to working in cultures with a different work ethic, seem too laid back at best and chaotic at worse. Talk about FRUSTRATION when one wants to get things done in a reasonable length of time. One thing for sure, people do enjoy a better quality of family life than we do in our countries nowadays and one is always made to feel part of a community, even if one is a foreigner. The weather and food are awesome, too. But I am so ready to go back home...
publicado por MissTrudy às 3:01 pm (EST) em Oct 15, 2007
publicado por mschuyler às 10:01 pm (EST) em Oct 7, 2007
Thought you might find this article of interest.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/07/opinio...
I am spending some time in Central America, so my access to the internet is not, alas, as often nor smooth as one would like it to be. Hence, I haven´t been able to participate much, but when I can, I enjoy reading the discussions.
Best wishes,
Trudy
publicado por MissTrudy às 1:36 pm (EST) em Oct 7, 2007
In jest (partly) and appreciative of your good humor,
ET
(BGP is to get the same message - but I didn't want to bore the others)
publicado por enevada às 12:07 pm (EST) em Oct 2, 2007
What am I, chopped liver??
;-)
publicado por AsYouKnow_Bob às 3:29 pm (EST) em Sep 22, 2007
publicado por geneg às 11:10 am (EST) em Sep 22, 2007
publicado por geneg às 11:10 am (EST) em Sep 22, 2007
Kidding, you are a better man than me, Gunga Din.
ET
publicado por enevada às 2:44 pm (EST) em Sep 20, 2007
publicado por geneg às 12:24 pm (EST) em Aug 31, 2007
I really appreciate your posts. The whole "Liberal/Conservative" thing confuses me these days. You can't tell the players without a scorecard and their actual behavior only confuses things more.
But "thoughtful"... that is a concept I understand. And thoughtful you are.
publicado por Arctic-Stranger às 1:35 pm (EST) em Aug 14, 2007
publicado por cnrenner às 2:58 pm (EST) em Aug 11, 2007
publicado por wordwanderer às 6:15 pm (EST) em Aug 9, 2007
Sorry about busting your chops on the typo, but I just couldn't help myself! No hard feelings, I hope...
Jim
publicado por drneutron às 3:16 pm (EST) em Aug 9, 2007
To be honest, with the current administration, I am kind of interested in what a conservative really is. It seems the definitions have not caught up with the practice. We have had a "liberal" president who promotes free trade and welfare reform, and who runs up surpluses instead of debt, and now a "conservative" who became an interventionist in foreign policy.
These are interesting days.
publicado por Arctic-Stranger às 1:18 pm (EST) em Aug 9, 2007
publicado por geneg às 9:59 am (EST) em Jul 30, 2007
publicado por geneg às 11:02 pm (EST) em Jul 29, 2007
publicado por geneg às 8:07 pm (EST) em Jul 29, 2007
publicado por adkrim às 4:23 pm (EST) em Jul 27, 2007
publicado por adkrim às 2:45 pm (EST) em Jul 27, 2007
I just saw this:
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/amer...
and wanted to bring it to your attention....
- Bob
publicado por AsYouKnow_Bob às 11:08 am (EST) em Jul 15, 2007
publicado por gregtmills às 7:00 pm (EST) em Jul 9, 2007
The little indie movie house near me summed it up best when they ran this snide little comment on the marquee when they were showing "The Motorcycle Diaries". "You own the t-shirt, now see the movie!"
My pet liberal annoyance is affirmative action. How do you know when it works? How do you measure "justice"? What possible sign post can you create that will tell you when you've reached the goal?
I'm not totally adverse to social tinkering, especially local, gradualist tinkering (and to be sure, there are point when gradualism won't cut it. "Letter From Birmingham Jail" makes that point exquisitely.)
Funny thing happened soon after the invasion of Afganistan (supported that. Not iraq). I used to work across from a local news station and one afternoon this little knot of protestors appeared outside the station. Me and my coworkers watched. It was a nice day, it was lunch, so what the hell?
They aren't really doing much, just milling around. I think one of the signs literally mentioned hugs. We noticed there were a couple of cops sitting there watching with bemused looks on their faces.
We went over to talk to the cops: "They really aren't going to do anything until the cameras come out, then they generally do some kind of passive resistence deal. The station wants them out of there, and films it at the same time. We round 'em up, drive 'em a couple of blocks, then let them out."
"You don't arrest them?"
"Not unless the station wants to press changes."
The station didn't take the bait that day, and the cops wandered off after a while, as did the protestors. Nice little scam: the station gets content, protestors get a narrative, cops get overtime.
My brother works at Lawrence Livermore Lab, and he regularly chats and jokes with the protestors, people who have been coming day after day for years. He says you can always suss out the newer recruits, because they're more serious.
God bless the crazy bastards. It's nice to have a hobby, I guess.
publicado por gregtmills às 5:28 pm (EST) em Jul 9, 2007
It's interesting topic, however. How do you, in a system where there are really only two muddy big-tent ideologies, handle contradictions that crop up from fusionism? How much bile should a person have to swallow in order share the ability to describe yourself as "x" with some knuckledragger or shrill bluenose know-it-all?
publicado por gregtmills às 1:04 pm (EST) em Jul 9, 2007
publicado por ggchickapee às 2:08 pm (EST) em Jul 8, 2007
publicado por MissTrudy às 9:02 am (EST) em Jul 6, 2007
Trudy
publicado por MissTrudy às 7:25 pm (EST) em Jul 5, 2007
publicado por corkery às 1:26 pm (EST) em Jul 3, 2007
publicado por fauxcajun às 9:25 pm (EST) em Jul 1, 2007
I know Francis Fukuyama attempted it when writing "The End of History and the Last Man". It's interesting to see marxian analysis evolve after the decline of Marxist ideology. I'd be curious to hear your story of disillusionment/enlightenment.
Anyway, thanks for your decency.
Greg
publicado por gregtmills às 12:43 am (EST) em Jun 30, 2007
publicado por MAJGross às 12:57 pm (EST) em Jun 28, 2007
Is there a term for how structurally fatal a bug is? I'm not sure that I'm phrasing this properly, but I'm thinking something along the lines of the fact that, despite their respective successes, relativity and quantum mechanics are incompatible. We don't regard this as reason to necessarily discard either theory. Is there a name for this or for the converse?
publicado por Jesse_wiedinmyer às 11:45 am (EST) em Jun 20, 2007
publicado por drneutron às 9:32 am (EST) em Jun 18, 2007
I'd agree with you that Lakoff definitely oversimplifies quite a few things. I think that Lakoff is more counter-propaganda than objective observer. He's not so much trying to find an objective frame as trying to "reframe" in a liberal light.
It's part of the reason that Didion is one of my favorite authors. She's very good at exploring narratology and exploring the way that the stories that we tell ourselves shape our worldview. As for your comment about the way we deal with the people that are not us... It's one of my favorite topics. Jerzy Kosinski, in The Painted Bird, tells of a pasttime when he was growing up. The villagers would capture a bird, and paint it in gaudy colors. When the bird was released in to the wild, all of the other birds of it's species would attack it, viewing it as an intruder. It's a rather powerful metaphor.
I'm beginning to think that most political thought is pretty purely identity thought. And how you deal with what is foreign to you. Being a computer programmer, you'd probably enjoy my favorite joke. It comes from G.H. Hardy's notebooks. (don't stop me if you've heard this one before)
Teacher (standing at the front of the classroom): Suppose 'x' is the number of sheep in the pen.
Johnny: Teacher! Teacher!
Teacher: Yes, Johnny?
Johnny: Suppose it isn't...
I tell this joke to a hell of a lot of people. About 1 in 25 gets it immediately. Hardy, so his notebooks say, told the joke to Wittgensteing. "Ludwig, Isn't this the most profound philosophical joke you've ever heard?" Hardy asks.
Wittgenstein, of course, agrees that it is.
But suppose it isn't...
publicado por Jesse_wiedinmyer às 3:51 pm (EST) em Jun 15, 2007
Thanks for the welcome. I'll admit that my bias is towards liberalism (whatever the hell that actually means), but I'm more than happy to check out other viewpoints. If I had to actually choose One Label for myself, it would probably be agnostic. As in this quote from Feynmann -
"You see, one thing is, I can live with the doubt and uncertainty and not knowing. I think it's much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers which might be wrong. I have approximate answers and possible beliefs and different degrees of certainty about different things, but I'm not absolutely sure of anything and there are many things I don't know anything about, such as whether it means anything to ask why we're here.
I don't have to know an answer. I don't feel frightened by not knowing things, by being lost in a mysterious universe without any purpose, which is the way it really is as far as I can tell. It doesn't frighten me."
I participate in another forum, called @ http://www.readerville.com , where most of the posters are rather liberal, but it seems to be a rather knee-jerk liberalism (conservatives, oddly enough, don't seem to have a lock on knee-jerking). So I decided that maybe it was time to start looking in to what I think I'm disagreeing with. So far I've read a bit of Ann Coulter (terrible), Dinesh D'Souza (makes valid points, but I disagree in large part with his general thrust, and he makes some major errors), and George Will (pretty good, though he seems to, like the comment that I've always heard about Keynes, take things at a case by case basis, and have no overarching philosophy.)
Anything that you'd recommend I read...?
Thanks again for the welcome,
Jesse
publicado por Jesse_wiedinmyer às 12:33 pm (EST) em Jun 14, 2007
- IVF violates all the stuff that wingnuts object to.
- IVF is currently used today in fertilty treatments to generate millions? of embryos, which are routinely disposed of.
- IVF benefits only those people who can spend tens- (or even hundreds-) of thousands of dollars in trying to conceive: that is to say, it's useful mostly to the rich.
- Therefore, IVF is legal in the United States. Despite violating all the wingnut priorities.
- Stemcell research promises to benefit all mankind.
- "Benefiting all mankind" by definition provides no obvious differential advantage to the rich.
- Medical researchers are educated people, who are wary of wingnuts and republicans, and are people who tend to vote Democratic anyway.
- Banning stemcell research gains approval among the wingnuts.
Therefore, the Republican Congress voted to restrict it.
It's really that simple.
Because, after all, if foreign labs employing stemcell research actually come up with something, the rich can always fly to Switzerland for treatment. The added airfare is a negligible inconvenience.
QED.
publicado por AsYouKnow_Bob às 6:49 pm (EST) em Jun 5, 2007
I'm a democratic socialist. The other half of the split appealed to me
when I was younger, but the Mensheviks were right. Perhaps I should be
Martovlibrarian?:)
publicado por mensheviklibrarian às 11:22 am (EST) em Jun 5, 2007
Would posting them here be okay or would you like me to email them to you?
publicado por codyed às 9:24 pm (EST) em Jun 3, 2007
- Bob
publicado por AsYouKnow_Bob às 7:38 pm (EST) em May 31, 2007
publicado por neummy às 11:36 am (EST) em May 31, 2007
SMILE when you say that, pard'ner.
Like any good lefty, I'm all for diversity, awareness of the ideological underpinnings, subverting patriarchy - - all that good stuff... so, yeah, there's "something" to it, but that's still a LONG way from endorsing "post-modernism".
(posted here so that I don't interrupt the big guns who have moved into that thread.)
PS: You know better than to assert that corporations are "non-ideological". The ideology of corporatism might be THE greatest danger to modern civilization. But that's yet another thread.
publicado por AsYouKnow_Bob às 9:56 pm (EST) em May 30, 2007
Thank you for the tutorial on posting the links. I can use it!
Keep up your terrific posts. I always learn a great deal.
Steiac
publicado por steiac às 9:51 pm (EST) em May 21, 2007
http://www.librarything.com/talktopic.ph...
...and then this morning the 'Glimmer Twins' showed up.
I drafted a comment pointing out how they pretty much proved the point of that thread (that it's still possible for L & C to hold a conversation - except when they show up and rhetorically begin flinging poop).
But I don't think I'll bother to post it - one of them has already attacked me personally for contradicting him (a few months ago, on another thread) and I had resolved then never again to engage with him, never to participate in another thread with him.
We'll talk again, though, when they move on. I enjoy your conversation.
Cheers,
- Bob
publicado por AsYouKnow_Bob às 8:59 pm (EST) em May 7, 2007
publicado por reading_fox às 5:00 am (EST) em Mar 20, 2007
I note you are currently in Guildford, a town where I went to Uni a few years ago. I hope the surrounding woods and countryside are still as beautiful as they were when I was exploring them. I suspect the sports hall of a cathedral is still as ugly as it was then!
Do you read any fiction at all?
publicado por reading_fox às 12:14 pm (EST) em Mar 15, 2007
I appreciate your comments by the way, in the Political Conservative group. I am finding the whole discussion, aside from the ruffled feathers, enlightening and interesting.
publicado por MrsLee às 2:04 pm (EST) em Mar 5, 2007
YIPES! I wish you would visit my profile and talk to me about this a bit. Do you really see us as dangerous as Muslim extremists? I wonder just what you think our motives for homeschooling are? I'm not upset or offended by different opinions by the way, but I do like to talk to people about our differences.
publicado por MrsLee às 7:53 pm (EST) em Mar 4, 2007
publicado por DexterDiffring às 6:29 pm (EST) em Mar 4, 2007
Within seconds of Tim telling me about it, I ignored the group. I didn't ever post in it anyway. I may not agree with 90% of the opinions there, but, to me, arguing with someone in their own "house" is rude.
publicado por Morphidae às 6:31 pm (EST) em Mar 3, 2007
It might not even be necessary any more. Tim added an "Ignore this Group" feature which should help considerably!
publicado por Morphidae às 1:53 pm (EST) em Mar 3, 2007
One of your recent posts (about sectioning off poly cons groups) got me thinking about definitions. In some of the threads, a poster's conservative bona fides are questioned when they question the motives or character of well-known personalities. It can be ironic when the original poster is very deeply conservative in areas such as service, character, religion, finance, etc. and yet find their conservative credentials being questioned.
publicado por NativeRoses às 10:39 am (EST) em Mar 3, 2007
publicado por haylan às 1:07 pm (EST) em Nov 2, 2006
publicado por keylawk às 4:24 am (EST) em Oct 31, 2006
Men often see women as having "the power," which is the reason women have rarely held political power; and when they do it is at the cost of their sexuality not because of it. The only exception to this might be Eva Peron.
I believe women have an opportunity to make major contributions starting right now, but only if they start respecting each other's abilities and can the jealousies, envies and despise that -- at least -- white women hold for each other.
What interests me personally is why so few women are libertarians...the ratio is staggering. Of course, the preponderance of libertarians are engineers so maybe there is a link in there somewhere.
publicado por haylan às 11:58 am (EST) em Oct 24, 2006
publicado por ggchickapee às 5:42 pm (EST) em Oct 16, 2006
publicado por nickhoonaloon às 6:50 am (EST) em Oct 6, 2006
It would be fun to debate in some forum. Would need a few ground rules so people keep it civil as much as poss.
Your point about my choice of Marxists may well be correct.
publicado por nickhoonaloon às 4:13 pm (EST) em Oct 4, 2006
publicado por ggchickapee às 8:05 pm (EST) em Sep 13, 2006
I thought I had heard all the categorizing labels -- neo-con, paleo-con, theo-con, crunchy-con . . . . But I've never heard of a "crypto-con." Does she like to decode messages? Or is she just difficult to understand?
publicado por ggchickapee às 10:39 am (EST) em Sep 13, 2006
publicado por ggchickapee às 2:24 pm (EST) em Sep 11, 2006
publicado por lcole às 10:19 pm (EST) em Apr 11, 2006