|
A carregar...
Carregue para marcar esta mensagem como abusiva
O quer pode ser considerado abuso? (1) Ataques pessoais, (2) solicitações comerciais e (3) spam (ver termos de utilização.
Jul 3, 2009, 4:25am (topo)Mensagem 1: Terry-KeithWedding date comes near at hand. Choosing wedding dresses has been submitted to schedule and also becomes a big tough task for me. My friends tell me the following three styles are fashion now. I have to made comparison among them. Simple Style: Simple design could build up to the special character of ladies. However how to emphasize on the merits and avoid demerits is a tough point with simple designs in the international fashion industry. The excellent pruning and material are the best points for success, which could embody the quality and class of wedding dresses perfectly. In my opinions, this style is fit for the girl who owns the strong sense of independence. Romantic Style: Maybe all of us would get to term of” romantic” for referred to wedding. And all of us make efforts to set up the natural and romantic mood. The wedding gowns with hollowed bordering ornament or lovely clarity flowers, mysterious veils. All of these embody romantic style. It is fit for the girls who own the sense of cultural. And I love this very much. magnificence style: None could deny that this style could make guys shining all of the time. But only magnificence is not enough, also include the elegant is perfect. It owns the French Royal style, embodies the glorious girls in prom dresses. But I don’t favor it very much for shinning so much. Jul 3, 2009, 5:53am (topo)Mensagem 2: MrAndrewYou know what they say. Build a better wedding, and men will beat a path from your door. Good luck though! Jul 3, 2009, 6:02am (topo)Mensagem 3: JodyreadseverythingI always think that simple is best, it doesn't date or age in the photo's. Jul 3, 2009, 10:36am (topo)Mensagem 4: lilithcatT-K? Is there a book about this that you want to discuss? Jul 3, 2009, 4:29pm (topo)Mensagem 5: MrAndrewcounter-flagged. :P~ Jul 3, 2009, 9:12pm (topo)Mensagem 6: SugarCreekRanchI agree with Jodyreadseverything. If you choose based on what is "in style", the pictures may look strange 10 or 20 years from now. Choose a simple, timeless design. And counter-flagged. It's not a Book Talk topic, but it's surely not "abuse". Jul 4, 2009, 4:45am (topo)Mensagem 7: calmcounter-flagged. It would be better posted in Off Topic but lots of people post in the wrong group. Jul 4, 2009, 9:08am (topo)Mensagem 8: MsDonna#3 & 6 that's so true. Perhaps I should post a photo of the shiney jacket my husband wore at our wedding as a precautionary tale to all. ETA: muhahaha Mensagem editada pelo seu autor, Jul 4, 2009, 9:09am. Jul 4, 2009, 9:28am (topo)Mensagem 9: Jodyreadseverything#8 - please do, we'd love to see that. Also counter-flagged. Jul 4, 2009, 10:52am (topo)Mensagem 10: MrAndrewDo that and i'll post some retaliatory big-hair photos. Jul 4, 2009, 12:47pm (topo)Mensagem 11: BookslothI got married in the 70s - cream suit and mullet (him), general hippy look (me). Go for simple and classic every time. And how does one counter-flag? Are we having trouble with the thought police again? Jul 4, 2009, 1:53pm (topo)Mensagem 12: Jodyreadseverythingclick on flag abuse and it gives you the option to flag or counter flag. Jul 4, 2009, 2:02pm (topo)Mensagem 13: Jim53#11 we did too, Booksloth. I wore a beige tux, with best man in a brown one. I hope they've been burned. Fortunately Mrs53 had the good taste and sense to wear a timeless, simple wedding gown. Jul 4, 2009, 2:19pm (topo)Mensagem 14: DeltaQueen50I refuse to even look at my wedding photos. I had frizzy permed hair and wore a wreath of flowers in my hair! My hubby-to-be wore the most ugly brown suit. I envy those who were smart enough to go for a classic look that will look good 40 years from their wedding. Mensagem editada pelo seu autor, Jul 4, 2009, 2:19pm. Jul 4, 2009, 2:24pm (topo)Mensagem 15: BookslothThanks for that, Jody. I had a feeling it might be something like that but was afraid to go anywhere near the flag in case it immediately logged me as a negative 'flagger'. Jul 4, 2009, 3:05pm (topo)Mensagem 16: SylviaCMy husband wore his suit. You know, the one that he has worn to every wedding and funeral for the last 20 years and will probably be buried in. I wore a little red dress. It's pretty easy when you only invite a dozen people to your wedding - and they're mostly family and don't need to be impressed. Jul 4, 2009, 3:09pm (topo)Mensagem 17: Jodyreadseverything#15 - Booksloth, lucky for me the flag abuse button isn't that sensitive. I often flag my own message as abuse when I actually want to click (back to top) and fortunately it asks you to confirm rather than just adds a red flag. Jul 4, 2009, 3:53pm (topo)Mensagem 18: BookslothCool - I just counter-flagged this one. (I bet there are a few people on LT who could flag in their sleep!) #14 My wedding outfit was a shiney, cream coloured, big shoulder padded, two piece suit - accompanied by a flower headpiece of pale pink carnations and baby's breath in my BIG curly hair. I personally blame the television show Dallas.
Touche MrA, those photos shall be kept private. Debug test: your member name is: |

