I have already read some of these essays but the new stuff and the odd re-read was highly rewarding.

Orwell is an exceptionally lucid writer, expressing insightful thoughts with clarity and imagination. The description of a working coalmine is direct and powerful, and even the lit crit about writers I haven't read comes across as sharp. The peach is "Politics and the English Language", which should be required reading for anyone who uses words, which is to say everybody. ( )

When Orwell met Miller in Paris in 1936 on his way to fight in Spain, the American novelist, who was completely indifferent to the Civil War, told Orwell that he was an idiot. In ‘Inside the Whale’ and three enthusiastic book reviews Orwell revealed his fascination with and attraction to Miller’s astonishing passivity and his total rejection of the concept of decency.

This was Orwell’s first collection of essays, published by Gollancz in March 1940 shortly after the Second World War broke out, emphasized a new and extremely important aspect of his work, which was recognized and appreciated by the critics. ‘Charles Dickens, ’ the longest of his essays and one of the earliest critical studies of the novelist, is still valuable for its freshness and vigor as well as for Orwell’s suggestive identification with his subject. ‘Boys’ Weeklies’ examines the political implications of those magazines ‘sodden with the worst illusions of 1910. ’ And ‘Inside the Whale’ uses Henry Miller to exemplify the attractive and comfortable declaration of irresponsibility which Orwell himself was unable to make.