one of those plays that makes you feel not so all alone. way out there story about a successful dude who's mid-life crisis is falling in love with a goat. that's right, the animal. a surreal story tries to be a modern day Shakespeare type drama/tragedy funny bits overall kind of a toss away. in 20 years it may be important. ( )

EDWARD ALBEE. THE GOAT OR WHO IS SYLVIA: NOTES TOWARD A DEFINITION OF TRAGEDY. 2000

SUMMARY:
Scene One:
As the play opens, Martin seems disoriented and forgetful or perhaps just plain preoccupied. He’s preparing to be interviewed by his old friend Ross. Martin and Stevie, his wife, are obviously still in love after many years together, although today their conversation seems disjointed....they don’t seem to be on the same wavelength. While in a play acting mode, Martin tells Stevie that he’s been unfaithful to her with a goat, which she naturally takes as a joke. After Ross arrives, there’s some talk of aging between the old friends and during the soon to be aborted interview, we learn that Martin is a prize winning architect who has been selected to construct the World City of the Future. We also learn that it’s his birthday (he’s 50). Martin’s responses during the interview seem ironic or perhaps he is just distracted, but the result is a funny scene although it results in the interview being scuttled. Ross senses something is bothering Martin and he finally elicits a confession from Martin that he has indeed been having an affair with a goat. Martin’s constant refrain through the rest of the play is “You don’t understand.”

Scene Two:
Stevie gets Ross’ letter and she winds up in a turmoil of jealousy and confusion. She feels betrayed and their openly gay son, Billy, seems to have lost respect for his father. During their argument, Stevie is in a rage and winds up destroying vases and lamps, before she exits the scene, threatening to bring Martin down.

Scene Three:
Although, it appears that the revelation about Martin has succeeded in destroying his marriage, this scene has some very touching moments between Billy and his father, which in fact culminate in a sensual embrace and a kiss which is witnessed by Ross who is shocked and contemptuous of such sensuality between father and son, calling it sick. Martin boldly speaks of how, as human beings, we have little control over what arouses a sensual response and how it can happen in any situation, however inappropriate it may be. He mentions examples of babies on laps and St Sebastian being penetrated by arrows. In Martin’s view what is truly sick is Ross’ betrayal of confidence and he’s appalled that Ross’ outrage seems to be contingent on whether or not people will find out the facts. The play ends in an outrageous scene in which a bloodied Stevie returns dragging a dead goat, apparently Sylvia. Martin cries in anguish: “What did she ever do?” Stevie says: “She loved you as much as I do.” The curtain falls.

CRITIQUE
Well, this play gives us a lot to chew on and first off, we would have to acknowledge that something is always lost in the reading of a play as opposed to attending a performance, especially when dealing with a metaphorical play of ideas, such as this one. To me the play seems to be about the many ways that love expresses itself through us as human beings and how our conventional perceptions and judgements can destroy relationships when such ways are revealed.
The complex play seems rich with ideas and probably generates more questions than answers. Questions such as:

Are there limits to whom or what we should love?
Are we mere vehicles for the expression of love beyond our personal and collective judgements, thus making jealousy an exercise in futility?
Are there certain sexual passions that should remain forbidden, however natural they might be for an individual?
Should certain sexual expressions be considered wrong or evil because they don’t conform to societal conventions?
On the level of acceptability, how does homosexuality come off in this play where bestiality is presented as the extreme? From this perspective, can this play in essence really be all about attitudes regarding homosexuality?

All these rather profound questions have failed to convey, however, my delight in reading what at times I found to be a very funny, moving, and entertaining play.
Thumbs up!!

LCB