Stephen Farthing

The best thing about this book might be the cover, which is beautiful. David Scott Kastan is clearly a guy who likes to hear himself talk; it is unclear exactly what "with Stephen Farthing" means... presumably as "an artist" he brought some technical expertise in colors and painting. Is it fair to downgrade a book because it didn't give me what I was hoping for, instead of judging it for how well it does what the author(s) intended to do? (The eternal reviewer's dilemma.) According to the jacket blurb, the book "investigate[s] color from numerous perspectives: literary, historical, cultural, anthropological, philosophical, art historical, political, and scientific." That's an awful lot for a book clocking in at just over 200 small-format pages, and definitely too much to deliver more than a pretty superficial skim of the subjects. Arranged in chapters each devoted to a particular color, they can be read (the author assures us) in any order. Which means there is no arc, no building, no synthesis, and a fair amount of repetition (including rather too much about artist Yves Klein and his famous blue, who I'm thinking must be a particular favorite of Farthing's?). The chapter on green spends a lot of words on how red and blue became codes for political leanings... so, all right, maybe the intent is to hang each chapter on a conceptual hook, rather than focusing on the actual color? Well, not really. Kastan is good at library (or internet) research, and cheerfully marshals lots of anecdotes and examples - many of which are interesting - in a chatty tone that too often veers into cute, punny, smart-aleck asides. The best chapter is the one on the color (or non-color) white, as he chooses to weave Moby Dick well into it, and as a literary scholar, this is what he's best at. Overall, though, the book reads more like a conglomeration of Wikipedia content processed with his own random ruminations and commentary. And yes, "The Dress" is mentioned (with photos) - but with very little serious examination or explication. Disappointing.… (mais)