Sidney G. Firman
Autor(a) de The Winston readers: Second reader
About the Author
Obras por Sidney G. Firman
The Winston Readers Fourth Reader 4 exemplares
The Winston Readers First Reader 4 exemplares
The Winston Companion Readers Primer 3 exemplares
The Winston Readers Third Reader 2 exemplares
The New Winston Third Reader 1 exemplar
The New Winston Primer and First Reader 1 exemplar
New Winston Second Reader, the 1 exemplar
The Winston Readers Second Reader 1 exemplar
The New Winston First Reader 1 exemplar
The Winston companion readers 1 exemplar
Etiquetado
Conhecimento Comum
- Data de nascimento
- 1868
- Data de falecimento
- 20th Century
- Sexo
- male
Membros
Críticas
You May Also Like
Associated Authors
Estatísticas
- Obras
- 20
- Membros
- 62
- Popularidade
- #271,094
- Avaliação
- 3.5
- Críticas
- 2
- ISBN
- 1
Published in 1929, this telling of the story of Reynard the Fox was probably my least favorite, of any of the many ones I read during the course of my research for my masters dissertation, which examined three centuries of Reynard retellings for children in the Anglophone world. I found the text itself stilted, and sometimes vaguely absurd. The ending - "Day after day Reynard grew worse and worse. At last he died, but just before he died he said he was sorry he had been such a bad fox. He hoped his children would grow up to be good foxes" - struck me as unintentionally amusing, with its stiff and cliched moralizing, and its final illustrations of the fox's tombstone. Despite my personal indifference to it, the book was still quite interesting, chiefly because of that altered ending, and what it potentially says about expectations of children's books in the USA in the 1920s. The author claims in his introduction that the fox's eventual triumph is "out of keeping with present-day standards of morality," and that he must therefore change it. Based upon my research, it would seem that early 20th-century American educators struggled, much as their British counterparts did in the Victorian period, with the essential amorality of this story, and its vulpine hero. Leaving aside its interest as a historical record of changing ideas about morality in stories for children, I'm not sure this one has strong appeal. Recommended chiefly to determined Reynard fans, or to fans of Frederick Richardson, who contributed the illustrations.… (mais)