Marjorie Heins

Censorship has been used throughout the years to "protect" children, women, the mentally deficient and the socially inferior classes who are simply to fragile or vulnerable to be exposed to dangerous and challenging ideas.

This book takes a look at the history of the censorship and the attempts to control the expression of ideas and thoughts using the threat to and protection of the innocent. Even if no one can ever clearly explain and prove what that threat is.

It was a bit hard to get through at times due to all the legalese, scientific studies and court cases that are referred to which makes for dry reading, but in between all of that was some really good, eye opening points about censorship in our country through the years.

I came into this with a pretty clear cut idea of what I thought about censorship and using it to protect children, and while my opinions on this haven't really changed I at least have a better appreciation for how complicated the issue is.… (mais)

A quote:
"The ponderous, humorless over literalism of so much censorship directed at youth not only takes the fun, ambiguity, cathartic function, and irony out of the world of imagination and creativity, it reduces the difficult, complicated, joyous, and sometimes tortured experience of growing up to a sanitized combination of adult moralizing and intellectual closed doors."

This book is a legal history of censorship and intellectual freedom written by a lawyer who, when the book was written, is director of the Free Expression Policy Project at the National Coalition Against Censorship. It chronicles the advent and life of censorship. The book is interesting and well-written. Most importantly when dealing with a legal/academic subject for lay people, it is easy to read.

Beginning with the introduction of the concept of childhood and continuing with what that concept has done to laws, the book looks at major cases that have led to where we are now. Along with the anecdotal case, social science is critiqued and acclaimed as it was used to justify arguments in each case. Censorship all over the world, with Europe being the most covered, is also discussed. The book ends with a chapter on the social science findings and ambiguities that have come up over the years.

Not all of the concepts were new to me, although it was very interesting to read all of the different ways that censorship has been applied over the years. It is ironic that many of the things that these laws are designed to shield young people from are actually created by the youth themselves. I find it intriguing that the way we choose to protect children is by keeping knowledge and truth from them. Of course, there is a time to discover, but that time is not on a schedule. Putting an age on acquiring knowledge is short-sighted and simplistic.… (mais)