Picture of author.

D. Edmond Hiebert (1910–1995)

Autor(a) de James

35+ Works 2,850 Membros 12 Críticas 1 Favorited

About the Author

Image credit: Direction Journal

Obras por D. Edmond Hiebert

James (1979) 319 exemplares
First Timothy (1957) 227 exemplares
1 Peter (1984) 225 exemplares
Second Timothy (1958) 200 exemplares
Titus and Philemon (1957) 178 exemplares
1 & 2 Thessalonians (1992) 156 exemplares
Mark, a portrait of the servant; (1656) 59 exemplares

Associated Works

The Expositor's Bible Commentary: Ephesians through Philemon (1978) — Contribuidor, algumas edições1,167 exemplares

Etiquetado

Conhecimento Comum

Nome legal
Hiebert, David Edmond
Outros nomes
Hiebert, D. Edmond
Data de nascimento
1910-07-27
Data de falecimento
1995-01-30
Sexo
male
Nacionalidade
USA
Local de nascimento
Corn, Oklahoma, USA
Local de falecimento
Fresno, California, USA
Locais de residência
Fresno, California, USA
Educação
Southern Baptist Theological Seminary (ThM|1939, ThD|1942)
Organizações
Evangelical Theological Society

Membros

Críticas

Dr. Hiebert deals lucidly and accurately with the background and content of the Epistles of Peter, James, John, Jude and the letter the Hebrews.
 
Assinalado
phoovermt | Mar 27, 2023 |
The author discusses the Pauline Epistles historical circumstances of their writing, deals with critical problems, and provides helpful general information on the content and nature of the books themselves.
 
Assinalado
phoovermt | Mar 23, 2023 |
In my mind, Hiebert oftens overplays the Greek (tenses especially) to give a meaning that he is happy with. Overall, however, he does a good job of laying out the text. He does not go into great detail about various interpretive issues. When there is a difficulty, he may or may not mention all the options, but he does choose one, often without in depth analysis as to why. His work is well footnoted, though, and further study is not hard to find for those who are looking. Not my favorite commentary of James, but not my least either. For someone looking for an introductory look at the issues and text, this will do ok.… (mais)
 
Assinalado
memlhd | 2 outras críticas | Jan 23, 2016 |
In my mind, Hiebert oftens overplays the Greek (tenses especially) to give a meaning that he is happy with. Overall, however, he does a good job of laying out the text. He does not go into great detail about various interpretive issues. When there is a difficulty, he may or may not mention all the options, but he does choose one, often without in depth analysis as to why. His work is well footnoted, though, and further study is not hard to find for those who are looking. Not my favorite commentary of James, but not my least either. For someone looking for an introductory look at the issues and text, this will do ok.… (mais)
 
Assinalado
memlhd | 2 outras críticas | Jan 23, 2016 |

You May Also Like

Estatísticas

Obras
35
Also by
1
Membros
2,850
Popularidade
#9,006
Avaliação
½ 3.3
Críticas
12
ISBN
43
Línguas
2
Marcado como favorito
1

Tabelas & Gráficos