Retrato do autor
8 Works 433 Membros 8 Críticas 1 Favorited

About the Author

Steve Keen is Professor of Economics and Head of the School of Economics, Politics and History at Kingston University.

Obras por Steve Keen

Etiquetado

Conhecimento Comum

Sexo
male
País (no mapa)
Australia

Membros

Críticas

Not very clear or convincing. Constantly feel like I need a glossary (uses "marginal productivity", "marginal product of labour" and "marginal revenue product" near interchangeably for example. No idea what makes each different). I fully admit this is at least partially my own fault - it would be ridiculous to expect to understand a huge amount of economics just reading straight through. But I felt it could have been made easier. I felt often like I could see how a neoclassical economist would rebut what's being said, although obviously not the details. I'm no friend of neoclassical economics but he seems to sell it a bit short - teaching ridiculously simplistic assumptions to undergrads and then teaching stuff closer to reality later is sadly pretty typical. He shows that the basis of neoclassical economics is crap but a lot of what he says is "right" feels remarkably similar. A lot of the time it didn't feel like it was hitting the right mark between "teaching neoclassical economics and showing the problems" and "sketching out an alternative".

Why is it taken as a given that capital makes a profit in and of itself? It's just stated with no evidence (chapter 7, while explaining Sraffa). Coming from a Marxist perspective it feels pretty pathetic. Actually a lot of the time I was reminded of Marx - for example talk about classes being better ways of analysing things, labour considered separately/important - but he criticises Marxist perspectives, even devoting a whole chapter to it. He apparently knows a lot about Marx but he makes a few criticisms which are just absurd - for example, the idea he quotes of a "commodity residue", which should somehow "prove" the labour theory of value is incorrect by showing that there's always a commodity that labour has to work with. This ignores that capitalism is presented by Marx as historical (therefore not everything previously made has been a capitalist commodity) for a start. http://mccaine.org/2012/07/04/steve-keens-critique-of-marxs-theory-of-value-a-re... This article gives a lot of criticism of this particular section.

He thinks science can be non-ideological but economics isn't and seems to think that the reason for this has nothing to do with the role of economics or anything, just that economists are stubborn or something.

Really it's not my ideological problems that are frustrating me, it's just that I'm not really building up a super clear picture either of neoclassical economics or his alternative because it's tough going with little help from the text in terms of either a glossary, summaries of concepts or anything like that. I don't know if I'm expecting too much but I guess it's important to point out that if you're looking for an intro to economics combined with a criticism of it you'll have a lot of trouble most likely.
… (mais)
 
Assinalado
tombomp | 6 outras críticas | Oct 31, 2023 |
De plus à la rencontre initiale de ce titre, il est recommandé par Gaël Giraud, qui l'a traduit avec un doctorant, dans un entretien zoom avec des candidats députés Nupes sur Facebook.
 
Assinalado
jmv55 | 6 outras críticas | Jun 7, 2022 |
The Great Financial Crash had cataclysmic effects on the global economy, and took conventional economists completely by surprise. Many leading commentators declared shortly before the crisis that the magical recipe for eternal stability had been found. Less than a year later, the biggest economic crisis since the Great Depression erupted.
 
Assinalado
MichaelODullard | Apr 6, 2019 |

Listas

You May Also Like

Estatísticas

Obras
8
Membros
433
Popularidade
#56,454
Avaliação
4.1
Críticas
8
ISBN
25
Línguas
3
Marcado como favorito
1

Tabelas & Gráficos