Retrato do autor
1 Work 109 Membros 8 Críticas

About the Author

Dave Levitan is a journalist whose work has appeared in the Philadelphia Inquirer, Scientific American, Slate, and many other outlets. He lives near Philadelphia with his wife. www.davelevitan.com @davelevitan

Obras por Dave Levitan

Etiquetado

Conhecimento Comum

Sexo
male

Membros

Críticas

(Just not interesting enough to keep reading.)
 
Assinalado
Treebeard_404 | 7 outras críticas | Jan 23, 2024 |
It's a short book (under 200 pages if you don't count the end notes), and a discouraging one. Nice to see a classification and many examples of misuse of science and it's probably important, but umpleasant reading. To tell the truth I resorted to skimming.
 
Assinalado
JudyGibson | 7 outras críticas | Jan 26, 2023 |
Note: I accessed a digital review copy of this book through Edelweiss.
 
Assinalado
fernandie | 7 outras críticas | Sep 15, 2022 |
Not A Scientist is a brilliant and incisive look into how politicians misunderstand Science and attempt to undercut it. Now I understand, thinking is hard. This is true especially if you have a number of people to command and a large area to “govern.” Science is something that requires thought, and clearly, it isn’t for everyone. However, given the cosmopolitan nature of our world, in general, it would be in our best interests to understand science in all of its facets. The unfortunate thing is that many do not understand or simply latch onto something that happened many years ago or was redacted.

Science is always moving forward. There is almost always another horizon to look forward to in the realm of science. Take something like Frontal Lobotomy, a universally panned and ridiculed practice nowadays. Did you know that the person who invented the Frontal Lobotomy earned a Nobel Prize for his efforts? Well, he did. However, politicians and some celebrities are convinced in the findings of outdated studies. I could talk for hours on some things if people would let me. Vaccination and Autism is one of those things. No, there is no relation between the two, but people continually refer to the study that wasn’t supported by any other scientist. The doctor who put out the paper lost his license to practice, yet people still prattle on about that paper he wrote.

The book is marvelously interesting and well-written in how it dissects the spurious arguments of politicians. Now the names that the author comes up with are merely his own terms, but you could probably find some proper names for them, perhaps some of them even have fancy Latin terms like Non-Sequitor or Modus Ponens or something.

So if you are a politician and you can withstand harsh criticism for your lack of basic scientific knowledge, you can avoid reading this book. On the other hand, the book is more for a voter since it does mention that this is meant to prepare you for bad arguments. I would highly recommend this book.
… (mais)
 
Assinalado
Floyd3345 | 7 outras críticas | Jun 15, 2019 |

Prémios

Estatísticas

Obras
1
Membros
109
Popularidade
#178,011
Avaliação
½ 3.7
Críticas
8
ISBN
4

Tabelas & Gráficos