P. B. Medawar (1915–1987)
Autor(a) de Advice to a Young Scientist
About the Author
Obras por P. B. Medawar
The Hope of Progress: A Scientist Looks at Problems in Philosophy, Literature and Science (1972) 20 exemplares
Structure in science and art : proceedings of the Third C.H. Boehringer Sohn Symposium held at Kronberg, Taunus,… (1980) 2 exemplares
Limites Da Ciencia, Os 2 exemplares
A discussion on demography 1 exemplar
An unsolved problem of biology 1 exemplar
Ihmisen biologinen tulevaisuus 1 exemplar
Peter Medawar 1 exemplar
Associated Works
The Animal in its World (Explorations of an Ethologist, 1932-1972), Volume I: Field Studies (1974) — Prefácio — 25 exemplares
Civilization & science in conflict or collaboration? a Ciba Foundation Symposium (1972) — Contribuidor — 4 exemplares
Etiquetado
Conhecimento Comum
- Nome legal
- Medawar, Sir Peter Brian
- Data de nascimento
- 1915-02-28
- Data de falecimento
- 1987-10-02
- Localização do túmulo
- Alfriston, Sussex, England, UK
- Sexo
- male
- Nacionalidade
- UK
- Local de nascimento
- Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro (state), Brazil
- Local de falecimento
- Royal Free Hospital, Hampstead, London, England, UK
- Locais de residência
- Oxford, Oxfordshire, England, UK
- Educação
- University of Oxford (Magdalen College)
Marlborough College - Ocupações
- biologist
- Relações
- Popper, Karl (friend)
Brent, Leslie (student, colleague)
Billingham, Rupert (colleague)
Burnet, Frank Macfarlane (co-recipient, Nobel Prize) - Prémios e menções honrosas
- BBC Reith Lecturer (1959)
Nobel Prize (Physiology or Medicine, 1960)
CBE (1965)
Order of Merit (1981)
Fellow of the Royal Society (1949)
Michael Faraday Prize (1987)
Membros
Críticas
Listas
Prémios
You May Also Like
Associated Authors
Estatísticas
- Obras
- 21
- Also by
- 5
- Membros
- 1,180
- Popularidade
- #21,785
- Avaliação
- 3.9
- Críticas
- 10
- ISBN
- 68
- Línguas
- 6
- Marcado como favorito
- 7
"An essay on scians" considers a whole raft of assertions about what science is and how it is perceived, often responding to them in unexpectedly playful ways — for example, he suggests that one of the joys of science is that essentially anyone can do it, and as a career-path it is, like sport in developing countries, a great way for ambitious young people from modest backgrounds to widen their horizons.
"Can scientific discovery be premeditated?" argues against the fashionable idea that scientists should be commissioned by funding bodies to answer specific (useful) questions: he points to numerous examples where someone researching in one field has made a discovery that turns out to be useful in quite a different area (e.g. x-rays). But he doesn't want us to call this "luck" — scientists go into such situations with their eyes open, and have trained themselves to see possible connections and crossovers.
The title-essay "The limits of science"looks into the consequences of the idea that there are certain types of question that are not susceptible to scientific examination — the famous "why are we here?" type of question. Medawar rejects the approach that these should be dismissed as not being valid questions: obviously they are questions some of us have a real need to ask. But he doesn't accept that this means we should put forward myth, metaphysics or religion as a more valid (or even equally valid) way of answering such questions. As long as they do not provide answers that can be empirically tested, he's not buying it. (But he does accept that metaphysics, in particular, can help to suggest ways of approaching difficult questions that scientists can learn from.)
"Limits" also provokes him to ask whether there is a built-in limit to the potential of science to answer questions that are susceptible to scientific investigation, just as there seem to be hard limits to things like population growth or the maximum size of aircraft. Is there ever going to be "too much knowledge" for scientists to keep an overview and do useful research into new things? He doesn't think so. The notion that there was ever a time when "one person could know everything" is silly, people have always specialised and worked in teams, and they continue to do so. Perceptively (given that he was writing in 1984, at the end of a long career), he also points out that computer databases have eliminated the need for an individual researcher to carry any but the most relevant technical knowledge around in their head.
Lovely writing, clear thinking, and only a hundred pages long. What's not to like?… (mais)