Richard Stoneman (1) (1951–)
Autor(a) de A Traveller's History of Turkey
Para outros autores com o nome Richard Stoneman, ver a página de desambiguação.
About the Author
Richard Stoneman is an honorary visiting professor in the Department of Classics and Ancient History at the University of Exeter. His many books include Alexander the Great: A Life in Legend and Xerxes: A Persian Life.
Obras por Richard Stoneman
Daphne into laurel : translations of classical poetry from Chaucer to the present (1982) 5 exemplares
Alexander Romance in Persia and the East (Ancient Narrative Supplementum) (2012) — Editor — 3 exemplares
Books we Might have Known 2 exemplares
Il romanzo di Alessandro vol.II 1 exemplar
Alexander the Great Second Edition 1 exemplar
Associated Works
The Oresteia: Agamemnon / The Libation Bearers / The Eumenides (0458) — Consultant Editor, algumas edições — 10,209 exemplares
The Greek Alexander Romance (2000) — Tradutor, algumas edições; Tradutor, algumas edições — 339 exemplares
Athenaeus and his world : reading Greek culture in the Roman Empire (2000) — Contribuidor — 8 exemplares
The Ancient Novel and Beyond (Mnemosyne, Bibliotheca Classica Batava Supplementum) (2003) — Contribuidor — 2 exemplares
Etiquetado
Conhecimento Comum
- Nome legal
- Stoneman, Richard John
- Data de nascimento
- 1951
- Sexo
- male
- Nacionalidade
- England, UK
- Locais de residência
- London, England, UK
Devon, England, UK - Ocupações
- classics editor
classics scholar - Organizações
- University of Exeter, UK
Routledge
Membros
Críticas
Listas
Prémios
You May Also Like
Associated Authors
Estatísticas
- Obras
- 29
- Also by
- 11
- Membros
- 654
- Popularidade
- #38,587
- Avaliação
- 4.0
- Críticas
- 5
- ISBN
- 88
- Línguas
- 7
Richard Stoneman does the best he can with the resources available in Xerxes: A Persian Life (galley received as part of early review program). He has a great handle on the relevant resources available in Greek and the current state of archaeology. In this work he even strains by using far later Iranian tales, which in whatever details they perhaps retain about Xerxes, are garbled and intermixed with stories of later Parthian and perhaps even Sassanid kings, as well as later operas and plays written by Greeks and Europeans.
Xerxes is as much a biography of the Persian Empire as it is a story about Xerxes himself. The author well framed the life of Xerxes in terms of how his father Darius ascended to the throne and Darius’ adventures against the Scythians and the Greeks. The author suggests Xerxes was constantly haunted by the specter of his father and keeping up the family legacy.
The author considered what could be known of life in the Persian court and how Xerxes would have conducted himself within it. The author uses Herodotus’ narrative in order to set forth Xerxes’ campaign against the Greeks and tries his best to imagine the situation according to Xerxes’ perspective. It would be impossible to consider the Greek campaign an unmitigated success, and its failings may have bedeviled Xerxes for the rest of his life; but it was not a complete failure, for many people did submit to him, and he was able to destroy Athens.
The author shows how Xerxes otherwise seemed to invest his time and efforts in a major building program at Persepolis, which proves quite difficult to consider since the Greek records suggest Alexander the Great very specifically targeted the parts of Persepolis built by Xerxes for destruction.
Xerxes’ home life is considered as well as the assassination plot which led to his death. You’d think much more would be recorded about such a great and influential king. And yet we seem to know more about many kings before and after Xerxes than Xerxes himself.
While the author casts aspersions on the historical legitimacy of the book of Esther for many not insignificant reasons, ironically, it would seem the author of the book of Esther might well have best captured the personality and spirit of Xerxes and his court. He was a man who got whatever he wanted, for better or for worse, and who could be easily directed for all kinds of ends. His biggest mistake was his biggest exploit, making himself the ultimate enemy of the Greeks, leading to the erasure of most of his legacy.
Xerxes ascended to the throne without drama, and despite his assassination, the throne passed relatively smoothly to his son Artaxerxes (I). It was not much, but it was something. And we are all left to consider how such aspirations to greatness could lead to such vanity and futility.… (mais)