Annalyn Swan

Willem de Kooning painted big canvases that reflected the way he lived: large. He juggled up to five love affairs at one time (and kept them all secret from each other and his wife, Elaine, with a variety of code door knocks), out-painted his rivals, such as Jackson Pollock, and was perhaps only happy drunk and asleep in a gutter. It was there, to riff on Wilde, that he saw the stars. De Kooning was the bohemian: part artist, part intellectual, part alcoholic playboy and pure adventuresome genius.

He was born in Rotterdam in 1904, and stowed away to the U.S. in the mid-twenties. He was already a master draughtsman, and went to work in New York as a commercial artist and window dresser. He made a pretty good living that way. In the 1930s, though, he abandoned commercial art in favor of the more dangerous path: “pure” art. De Kooning quit his jobs at the height of the Depression and just in time to help formulate a major wave in American (and world) painting: Abstract Expressionism.

He finally made it big in 1948 with a show at the Egan Gallery. He bucked expectations—and Abstract Expressionism—by next producing a series of more or less figurative works, the Woman series. These scribbley, colorful and larger-than-life canvasses were inspired by his wife and solidified de Kooning’s reputation as an artist first among equals. “I might work on a painting for a month,” he said, “but it has to look like I painted it in a minute.” A New York minute, at that: spontaneous and confrontational, a collision of high and low, of the child-like and the anciently wise.

De Kooning was a true student of art history: not of the books or the critics, but of the pictures themselves. He learned from and incorporated into his own works the styles of everyone from the painters of the walls of Lascaux to Picasso. As the critic Harold Rosenberg said,

If you had your own idea, that was it, you were stuck with it. The history of painting, however, contained endless inventions which the living painter could make his own. Even inventing a thing that had already been invented was an act of creation. De Kooning likes to call this ‘inventing the harpsichord’—the fact that we have the harpsichord, and even the piano that superseded it, does not prevent the invention that brought it into being from being legitimately repeated.

Stevens’ and Swan’s book is a delight for both art fans and gossip hounds, and it’s easy to see why it one the 2005 Pulitzer for biography. De Kooning was a wild man and he died the tragic death of the untamable. He lived a life that defied expectations and broke a lot of hearts. He painted a legacy that fills hearts and eyes with delight and wonder, and that will outlive us all.

Originally published in Curled Up with a Good Book… (mais)

4024. de Kooning: An American Master, by Mark Stevens and Annalyn Master (read 18 May 2005) This won this year's Pulitzer for biography, else I would never have read it (I have read 56 of the about 88 books which have won the Pulitzer Biography prize). This is a formidable book and has many of the attributes a good biography should have. de Kooning was born Apr 24, 1904 in Rotterdam, Netherlands, and came to the US in 1926 as a stowaway on a British freighter. The parts of the book relating his disordered life were of some interest, but the discussion of his painting was often just gibberish to me. Looking at his paintings reminded me of the boy's comments: "The Emperor has no clothes." But that merely shows what an illiterate I am in regard to painting such as de Kooning became famous and rich for. The authors hold that Jackson Pollack and de Kooning are the greatest American painters of the 20th century. I look on reading this book as an event in my reading life and as worthwhile, happy though I am that many people are not such amoral people as Willem de Kooning was.… (mais)