William Montgomery Watt (1909–2006)

Este libro surge de una preocupación sentida por muchos intelectuales en la situación mundial preestablecida. Si aceptamos que el curso de la historia está determinado en gran medida por factores económicos y materiales, ¿qué papel le queda al intelectual, cuya preocupación es con las ideas? Al estudiar la lucha y el logro de uno de los más grandes intelectuales musulmanes, el autor intenta proporcionar una respuesta. -
This book arises out of a concern felt by many intellectuals in the preset world predicament. If we accept that the course of history is to a large extent determined by economic and material factors, what role is left for the intellectual, whose concern is with ideas? By studying the struggle and achievement of one of the greatest of Muslim intellectuals, the author attempts to provide an answer.… (mais)

It's interesting to become a voyeur into other religions. I see how much of Islam is quite similar to Christian fundamentalism - subjugation to a text, promises or threats of an afterlife, and a general lack of humanism. Perhaps this belies my Christian theological orientation more. I don't really like Christian fundamentalism, nor do I like the Koran much.

I respect Muslims, and I mean them no harm. I just disagree with them that this is the meaning of life. I prefer the Christian story of grace and redemption. I wish to understand Muslims as they are my neighbor, whom I am commanded to love. That is why I read this Companion to the Koran. The scientist in me wants to understand the world around me; the religious side of me wants to learn how to love and respect Muslims more; the seeker in me wishes to understand what this book, so revered, has to contribute to a common human instinct to seek after God.

I leave my reading of this guide grateful that Islam has been in geographic retreat since 1666. Perhaps I should feel the same way about Christianity if I only read one commentary on the Bible instead of hundreds of books of theology. The Bible must come alive to be understood. That's why I like reading the history of religious activities alongside my Bible. The Koran must be the same way. One must first be oriented to learn deeply about the religion. I lack that deep learning - that life habituation - to understand this great book. In my ignorance, I find little compelling here, but I am open to learning more.
… (mais)

This is an excellent overview of early Islamic theology (which is really all that it covers, despite the more inclusive "thought" of the title). The publishers play up the value of this book as an introductory text, and I agree that it wouldn't be baffling to someone new to the topic; however, I don't feel that the information would really sink in unless you had some prior knowledge. Despite the textbook format, this is also an important piece of scholarship, as Watt definitely advances his own theories rather than simply reporting different views on each topic. He is sensitive to traditional Islamic historiography while falling squarely into the Goldziher/Schacht camp. Occasionally his analysis goes off course into some "Maybe they think this way because they're Arabs and they live in the desert" nonsense, but for the most part Watt has a balanced and transparent historical method. The book is getting a bit old; for either an undergraduate class or one's personal reading, I'd supplement this with the textbooks by Marshall Hodgson (also old), Patricia Crone, and Jonathan Berkey on classical Islamicate history and thought. The Flowering of Muslim Theology by Josef van Ess is a solid, quick read before tackling Watt.… (mais)