Folio Society

JacobKirckman: Folio at their best: non-academic, footnotes not required, nicely bound and good to hold. As always with Folio, avoid when footnotes and other information is required. (Trollope is light reading as afar as I'm concerned, so I don't really care about references).

JacobKirckman : When Folio are at their weakest. Beautifully bound and illustrated, and fine paper. But why (especially at the prices charged) exclude the foot and endnotes so important to the serious scholar? I have this two-volume set, sitting almost unused in my library, whilst the Penguin Paperback (same edition) is almost worn through - just because the Penguin is of actual use...