Bogus reviews?

DiscussãoFlaggers!

Aderi ao LibraryThing para poder publicar.

Bogus reviews?

Este tópico está presentemente marcado como "adormecido"—a última mensagem tem mais de 90 dias. Pode acordar o tópico publicando uma resposta.

2MarthaJeanne
Editado: Mar 1, 2013, 11:50 am

It does seem a bit surprising that so many people joined during a few days and put up two or three reviews that really say nothing but give 5 stars to that book.

That particular one is maybe the least bogus looking of the lot.

3aulsmith
Mar 1, 2013, 11:51 am

This looks more like sock puppetry to me, than flaggable reviews. Report to Jeremy?

4Jarandel
Editado: Mar 1, 2013, 12:18 pm

On a related topic, is something supposed to be done about authors self-rating 5 stars, sometime self-reviewing as well, their own books (sometime several copies of the same) but being quite transparent about it (their LT pseudonym is an identifiable version of their author name, and/or sometime both are linked to by an LT author notice) ?

5Nicole_VanK
Editado: Mar 1, 2013, 12:25 pm

As I understand it authors, just like any other users, are allowed to review any books in their lists - including their own. (The practice of rave reviewing your own books seems daft to me though - you're more likely to make a bad impression).

6lorax
Mar 1, 2013, 1:17 pm

4>

Nope. A long, long time ago Tim said he'd do something to mark such reviews as being by the author, so that we could take them with the appropriate amount of sodium chloride, but it didn't end up happening. Agreed with BarkingMatt that it's likely to backfire in the end, but that doesn't seem to stop anyone.

7rybie2
Editado: Mar 1, 2013, 3:45 pm

> 1-3

85 "reviews" of works by a new "LT Author" that are all written in the same sparse form (a few words, no capital letters or punctuation), all written within a few days of each other, all by members who joined in the same short time frame... and all the members have written only 1-2 reviews and have only a couple of books cataloged. And, for the icing on the cake, the reviews have multiple "thumbs up". No, I see no mystery here, but definitely a job for Jeremy.

8Nicole_VanK
Mar 1, 2013, 3:43 pm

Yes, I agree there is very little room for doubt it's sock puppeteering.

9jbd1
Mar 1, 2013, 9:17 pm

Zapped. Thanks. The numbers, &c. will take a little while to work though the system but the reviews are gone.

10slickdpdx
Mar 2, 2013, 12:34 am

Great!

11danielx
Mar 2, 2013, 10:36 am

Jeremy's a hero!

12Nicole_VanK
Mar 2, 2013, 11:47 am

Not entirely sure it was a good idea to suppress the book though. Right, it was all pretty spammy. I fully agree. But on the other hand it just might possibly still refer to a real book.

13MarthaJeanne
Editado: Mar 2, 2013, 12:04 pm

I'm sure it was a real book. And it also at first seemed like overkill to me, as well. After consideration, I think I like it. (But am still surprised.)

On the other hand, this clears the board so that if serious members add it a new work without the spammy background will be created, and the author has absolutely no value for all the work done.

14Jarandel
Editado: Mar 2, 2013, 12:06 pm

The book isn't suppressed, the link to it in the OP just isn't valid anymore due to zapping of sockpuppets & their garbage.

http://www.librarything.com/work/13474186

15jbd1
Mar 2, 2013, 12:07 pm

Right, the book itself is not suppressed: http://www.librarything.com/work/13474186

Once the indexes catch up it'll just have (far) fewer members and reviews.

16Nicole_VanK
Mar 2, 2013, 12:11 pm

Okay, sorry, suppressing the book was the only thing I was worried about. If not : forget I spoke.

17SimonW11
Mar 3, 2013, 4:13 am

love the author biography

18lilithcat
Mar 3, 2013, 9:13 am

> 17

While I appreciate the member's annoyance at Mr. Appel, that is just as inappropriate as posting the an image of cans of Spam® as an author image.

Infecting the site with garbage shouldn't be tolerated, whether from overenthusiastic authors or members who think they are "helping".