Spam reporting thread #67

É uma continuação do tópico Spam reporting thread #66.

Este tópico foi continuado por Spam reporting thread #68.

DiscussãoSpam Fighters!

Aderi ao LibraryThing para poder publicar.

Spam reporting thread #67

Este tópico está presentemente marcado como "adormecido"—a última mensagem tem mais de 90 dias. Pode acordar o tópico publicando uma resposta.

Mar 5, 2019, 8:46 am


Distinguish between the following, and flag the highest level of the violation:

-- Type 1: Irredeemable commercial spam: make sure to flag the member's profile, as well as the spammy activity. This type includes things selling strollers, pharmaceuticals, live-streaming sports games, porn, and/or trying to create traffic/links to sites for such things. Sufficient profile flags will automatically result in temporary suspension and deletion of the member's activity, so use your profile-flagging powers wisely and carefully.

-- Type 2: Teachable moments: DO NOT flag the member's profile, but DO flag the violating activity (e.g. self-promotional Talk post, group, or local venue). This type includes promotional activity that violates the Terms of Service (TOS), but where the member is potentially redeemable, e.g. overzealous authors, overzealous publishers, or other members with small TOS violations but who are otherwise using the site legitimately. These cases should be reported to staff (by sending a message or email to staff and/or or posting on this thread), so the member can be taught how to use the site.

Specific procedures:
-- Overzealous authors or publishers (these fall under type 2): do NOT flag the member's profile. Report to staff here or privately. You can also send the member a polite message pointing them to the terms, mentioning the "no promoting" language, and pointing them to the Do's and Don't page for authors:
-- Suspected sock-puppetry to promote a book, write fake reviews, and/or stack ratings: do not flag the profile, but report to staff here or by message, so staff can investigate. This is a serious violation for which members can be permanently banned.
-- Profile flags for commercial spammers only (type 1): On the member's profile page, click on the "report for spam" link, then follow instructions to flag the member. Again, this is only for commercial spam, not for "overzealous" authors, publishers, or booksellers, which should be reported to staff instead. See Talk post:
-- Spam or promotional posts in a Talk topic (type 1 or 2): flag the post as an abuse of the terms of service.
-- Spam or promotional groups (types 1 and 2): flag new groups using the "flag this group" link.
-- Spam lists: report in this thread, and flag the member if it's commercial spam.
-- Spam works (type 1 spam): flag the work as spam on the work's editions page, and then vote on proposed work spam. Make sure to read the guidelines before proposing or voting, especially for what is not spam. Voting page:
-- Spam in a review (type 1), or an explicitly promotional review (type 2): flag the review as an abuse of the TOS, using the red flag.
-- Spam or promotion in "published reviews," or other CK fields (type 1 or 2): post here and/or delete.
-- Spam or egregious promotion/advertising in venues or events (type 1 or 2): post here and/or delete. Note that authors are permitted to add events for their books.
-- Spam in book links / quick links: post here and/or edit to remove spam.
-- Spam author names listed on a work: No current procedure. Tim has asked us not to change CK to indicate spammers, and not to combine spam authors together.
-- Not sure if it's spam? Post here, and explain why.

Please note that Tim has asked us not to use either CK or the combining system (whether works or authors) for spam fighting.

For more information see these wiki pages:
Procedures for flagging and reporting spam:
Spam works, guidelines for flagging and voting:

(A copy of these guidelines, for pasting in new threads, can be found here or at the top of previous threads.)

Mar 5, 2019, 2:11 pm

Mar 5, 2019, 3:04 pm

Mar 6, 2019, 3:24 pm

web designer

started this group with lots of links to commercial sites

Mar 11, 2019, 3:41 am

spam comment to Spam Profile Hunt thread (LOL):
posted by member from last month:

Mar 12, 2019, 9:57 am

I don't know whether a group created by a spammer disappears when the account is gone.


Editado: Mar 18, 2019, 11:08 pm

Maybe not spam?
there's a user (jlspad | Dec 9, 2008) that has had their review red-flagged. I'm thinking red flagging is perhaps just a mistake. Maybe the link is leading to an out of date configuration for a website that's no longer valid? The user looks like a legitimate LT member in good standing.

(PS. If I am posting this comment in the wrong place, or it is not helpful to draw attention to small issues like this, please let me know on my profile).

Mar 19, 2019, 8:47 am

>10 SandyAMcPherson: The red flag is not just for spam, it's for any violation of the terms of service, including plagiarism, which that "review" is.

Mar 20, 2019, 7:44 am

Despite adding a book, this is a spam profile for a gambling site.

Editado: Abr 2, 2019, 12:24 am

You know, if it were't for the fact that the post replicates EXACTLY what is in the profile, I'd have probably been willing to leave a facsimile of the enthusiastic author post. Nope. Nope. Nope.

I think that it'll hit spam level pretty quick. I've already flagged the post, and am about to flag the account as well.

Please note the "seo" letters at the end of some of the links in the profile, and in that post.

ETA: Huh. That was really quick. Never mind, all gone.

Editado: Abr 2, 2019, 11:38 am

So my Recent Book Haiku module displays an interesting entry, but I can't seem to link through to the poster:
We are a prominent PPC management agency which has the experience and knowledge to craft and manage PPC campaigns that get you ahead of your competition
It's also on the main Haiku page, but ... appears to be slotted in between two legitimate haiku posts? (Between entries for The Nest by yoyogod and One Small Step by JerryStone2001.)

I'm confused.

Abr 2, 2019, 12:35 pm

>17 elenchus: Probably the work has already been removed as spam, or something.

You can find the spammer by checking out the Book Haiku common knowledge log:

The culprit:

Abr 2, 2019, 1:48 pm

>18 norabelle414:

Ah! -- thanks for that, it was looking to me as though a hacker had found a way to insert spam "in between" areas typically modifiable by end users. That worried me even though I didn't understand it. Didn't occur to me the poster had already been identified.

Abr 2, 2019, 1:57 pm

>19 elenchus: The poster had not been removed when I wrote that message, but the work that they had posted on had been suppressed as spam which is why a link to it did not show up on the recent Haiku page.

Abr 4, 2019, 2:53 pm

Abr 9, 2019, 9:01 am

>26 Watry:

It helps to provide a link to the profile of the person posting the spam, so that, if necessary, that profile can be flagged as well.

Abr 9, 2019, 12:40 pm

Good to know, thank you!

Abr 10, 2019, 7:49 am

Spam link in the topic, and linked from FB profile in Profile, don't click.

Abr 10, 2019, 7:51 am

Already gone...

Abr 12, 2019, 5:42 am

Essay sales platform. Sending out friend requests

Abr 12, 2019, 7:46 am

This member,

has written a very strange comment as a review (dated Sep 3, 2018), here:

Abr 12, 2019, 8:43 am

>32 SandyAMcPherson:

Not so strange. The book hadn't been published and the user really, really wanted it right away.

Not a review, and so appropriately flagged, but not spammy at all.

Abr 12, 2019, 9:40 am

>32 SandyAMcPherson: Goodreads encourages people to review books before they come out (or at least, doesn't discourage it), and then when people import their Goodreads data to LibraryThing those reviews come over too. You'll also see some imported reviews complaining about not being able to rate books with half-stars, even though LibraryThing does have half-stars.

Abr 13, 2019, 11:27 pm

Editado: Abr 18, 2019, 5:39 pm

She writes papers for students.

"Students pay for this paper works so it’s very important that everything is written with high quality."

Abr 18, 2019, 7:46 pm

>39 MarthaJeanne:

She wants to know what my favorite book is:

I'm very tempted to respond with this one: or perhaps this:

Abr 18, 2019, 9:11 pm

>39 MarthaJeanne: I've flagged her profile; yet she persists.

Editado: Abr 18, 2019, 9:24 pm

>41 2wonderY: Flag the topic. It just needs two more flags, and it'll be history.

(or for those who prefer it)

I've flagged her profile, and I can see she has three random books (more or less). Her location says Sandy, and one of the few places I know of that name is in Utah. I'm betting against that being her home.

ETA: Dang. I could be wrong on that. The "Sandy" link leads to Utah. No extraneous data. Weird.

Abr 20, 2019, 6:03 pm

>39 MarthaJeanne: >40 lilithcat: The same (or similair, asked the same question) under an other name:

Abr 22, 2019, 4:20 am

Abr 23, 2019, 11:33 am

Spam profile, despite the Harry Potter books added:

Abr 24, 2019, 5:11 am

ICYMI: Spam group, from early-morning spam account (same name as account):

Editado: Abr 24, 2019, 8:36 am

Abr 24, 2019, 9:11 am

lilithcat (#51):

In Case You Missed It.

Abr 24, 2019, 3:08 pm

New member/author. I left a message on the profile.

Abr 24, 2019, 3:20 pm

>53 amysisson: It's best to include the profile as well, since sometimes the new author ignores advice.

This way, there's a record. It's probably one out of one hundred that seems uninterested in following the friendly advice, and persists in announcing their efforts.

Sometimes it seems sad to know how difficult it is for new writers, but it was always difficult. With the advent of self-publishing that seems ubiquitous, there is a false encouragement. Ah, well. So it goes.

Abr 24, 2019, 3:26 pm

>54 Lyndatrue:

Thanks, good point!

Abr 25, 2019, 7:10 am

Post is definitely spam
Can't decide if the profile is just someone encouraging book sales, the author, or the publisher, or what.

Abr 25, 2019, 7:41 am

>58 gilroy: I saw that one but was doubtful enough (as to whether the post was spam) that I didn't flag it. The library is interesting though. I'd almost call it alternative alternative. More likely the poster is pushing an esoteric view of the world, I think, rather than directly trying to sell books.

I just hit "ignore'.

Abr 25, 2019, 7:54 am

>58 gilroy: My guess is the new member is the author. I flagged the post.

Editado: Abr 25, 2019, 8:42 am

>59 haydninvienna: If it was just a post about a book without an amazon link, I'd agree with you.

>60 2wonderY: Under the thought that they are the author/publisher, I've left the usual notification.

Abr 25, 2019, 12:16 pm

Ive just flagged this post, but on second thoughts I might have been a bit hasty: Could someone have a look and counter-flag if appropriate please?

Abr 25, 2019, 12:36 pm

>62 haydninvienna: Well, it doesn't appear to be spam, but it's kinda dumb to start a new group to post about it. Not many people would even notice the post.

Abr 25, 2019, 1:26 pm

>62 haydninvienna: Looks like someone trying to get a group going like the other Folio Society groups. Unless he has a group of known collectors, that's going to be a hard tread. Not sure I'd label it as spam... yet.

Abr 25, 2019, 1:58 pm

>62 haydninvienna: >64 gilroy:
Also, the account has been around since 2013, which is another argument against spam. The topic is now unflagged BTW.

Abr 25, 2019, 9:41 pm

Overactive author: Flagged topic.

Abr 25, 2019, 11:06 pm

>66 haydninvienna:

It really helps if you provide the profile link as well, so we can be sure that a note is left.

Abr 26, 2019, 10:58 am

>68 lesmel:

Left message on profile.

Abr 26, 2019, 12:42 pm

>70 karenb: This will be a hard one to get rid of, and may require intervention from staff. The profile was marked as an organization of some sort (I can't tell, because my flag was the tipping point, and it's suspended), and that means the work will need two more flags to get the special justice that all spammers deserve.

Abr 26, 2019, 1:07 pm

>70 karenb: I disagree with the work being spam. Did they have a review that was spammy? Because just the work itself isn't a spam work, from what I (and apparently two others) think.

Editado: Abr 26, 2019, 2:05 pm

>72 gilroy:

I think it probably is spam. A google search on the title reveals no books by that name. (In fact, I get only two results, neither of which is any form of media.)

Abr 26, 2019, 2:27 pm

>73 lilithcat: Um, we don't have to JUST catalog books here...

Abr 26, 2019, 2:41 pm

True, but they weren’t anything, just phrases within text.

Abr 26, 2019, 5:30 pm

>72 gilroy: >73 lilithcat:
I believe that the work is spam because the account was so clearly spam, and the work simply echoed a couple of phrases from the account. Just because the work isn't crappy spam doesn't mean that the work isn't spam -- if that makes any sense.

Another way to look at it: In the context of the spammy user account, the work is pretty clearly an extension of that spam and not an actual work of any kind.

Editado: Abr 27, 2019, 1:35 am

Abr 29, 2019, 6:24 am

Abr 29, 2019, 9:31 am

>81 Taphophile13: one of his books... for another of his books.

Editado: Abr 29, 2019, 10:30 am

Gee, and to think that it says Recommending your own book is strictly forbidden.

I left another comment.

Abr 29, 2019, 5:42 pm

Well, I just had a very nice note from PemWeno apologizing.

Interesting, though, he says that he "only read the email promo from the site which I thought said book promotion was okay". I am not sure what promo he means or what it says, does anyone know? Is it something that ought to be re-worded?

Abr 29, 2019, 6:19 pm

He sent me a similar message. He also said he didn't see the responses, which I didn't understand.

Abr 29, 2019, 8:48 pm

>84 lilithcat: and >85 gilroy: Doesn't much matter, because the account is now closed (not suspended, so he probably requested it).

Maio 1, 2019, 8:24 am

New member has added random books, but his profile translates as:

My name is Ivan! I am a blogger channel iLounge My blogs are related to unpacking and reviews of cell phones, cases, headphones, chargers and links. On this YouTube channel, you'll learn daily about technology, cell phone unpacking and polls, Iphone tips, and new application testing and training exercises. My energy is to show you the latest tricks in the world of technology and tips, traps for the most efficient use of your mobile phone.

Maio 2, 2019, 7:00 am

Advertising a reading platform on random threads:

Maio 4, 2019, 11:30 am

What is done with Spam tags?

New author added Amazon link:

Maio 4, 2019, 1:20 pm

Well, I'm still drinking my first cup of coffee (I got up VERY late), and I recognize that I lack even the vague pretensions of kindness, however, the profile for the author is absolutely filled with more links.

I thought about leaving the standard Welcome to LT message on his profile, but I desperately want to just flag the profile and be done with it.

Maio 4, 2019, 1:25 pm

>90 2wonderY: What actions are you looking for on the book? The stunning amount of html in those tags makes me want to stab my eyes. His account isn't any better.

Maio 4, 2019, 2:12 pm

>90 2wonderY: >91 Lyndatrue: >92 Lyndatrue: I went ahead and dropped the usual author warning/greeting. That said, I wanna flag it out of existence too...

Editado: Maio 4, 2019, 3:14 pm

>90 2wonderY:, >91 Lyndatrue:, >93 gilroy:

I'm not sure how helpful the usual message would be. After all, as far as I can see, he's not spamming the forums, and he's not posting links anywhere but on his own profile

There are the tags, of course, but as no one else has the book, those tags likely won't be noticed. They certainly won't affect anyone else. Unless, of course, his book suddenly becomes a huge best seller and scads of people catalog it. I hope he's not holding his breath.

Maio 4, 2019, 4:01 pm

Well, I got a very nice response (a rarity, I admit), but >94 lilithcat: is right. It didn't change the links in the tags etc.

Maio 4, 2019, 4:03 pm

I added a more specific note to yours and he replied that he would remove the tags. We'll see.

Maio 4, 2019, 4:13 pm


Maio 4, 2019, 4:13 pm

>95 gilroy:, >96 2wonderY:

The tags are gone.

Maio 4, 2019, 4:13 pm

>96 2wonderY: The tags are gone.

Maio 5, 2019, 12:49 am

(Re: >91 Lyndatrue: and etc.) All's well that ends well, or so they say. I'm hopeful that he'll at least behave, and who knows, maybe he'll settle in, and like it here. It's a pretty good place, after all.

Maio 7, 2019, 8:18 am

Added a real book, added herself as an author and her "review" is a repeat of her escort advert.

Maio 7, 2019, 8:24 am

Maio 7, 2019, 8:45 am

>102 2wonderY:

Her choice of book is certainly appropriate!

Maio 7, 2019, 9:17 am

Will her author name disappear? She seems to have added it to only her copy of the book, not Common Knowledge.

Editado: Maio 7, 2019, 10:19 am

>102 2wonderY: Et al; Going to the link you provided for the work shows the review muted (because of flags), but the "Book Details" show it as part of her Library, and that includes the "review" (twice, once in Review, once in Comments), and she's added herself as an Other Author (but not selected a role). I think this needs some sort of staff intervention.

On the other hand, it's only visible from the link you provided. I dunno.

Maio 7, 2019, 10:32 am

>106 Lyndatrue: Okay, not a problem then.

Maio 7, 2019, 7:42 pm

>105 2wonderY: >106 Lyndatrue:
I went into Other Authors and deleted/rejected her name. Recalculating title/author seems to have removed her as author from the work, though of course she still has a zero-work author page.

Maio 10, 2019, 1:19 am

>110 Taphophile13: Works are now flagged, reviews are now flagged, but the profile may require staff intervention. Any time there are that many works, even fake ones, it seems to keep it from the death it richly deserves.

Maio 14, 2019, 7:54 am

This author just added a new profile photo, which is how I took a look at her reviews, added back when the books were added. They are definitely Spam, with links, and are other peoples reviews as well. Can someone please take on writing her a note, please? I won't be polite this morning.

Maio 14, 2019, 9:17 am

>116 2wonderY: I marked the reviews as "against the TOS" but she added the reviews over a decade ago, so I don't know if there's a need to post a message unless she does something new that is against the TOS.

Editado: Maio 14, 2019, 9:23 am

>116 2wonderY:

I left her a note.

>117 norabelle414:

As she is apparently re-engaging with the site, I think a note might head off any additional spamming.

Maio 14, 2019, 11:04 am

>116 2wonderY: Reading through the profile, it feels more like a PR firm or someone other than the author proper created that, which might also explain the review snafu.

Maio 15, 2019, 7:54 am

I nearly missed this one:

their profile picture has a quiet link to their sales page.

Maio 15, 2019, 8:47 am

>119 gilroy:

I don't know. I've seen a lot of author profiles that use that sort of blurby sounding bio. I think they sign up on every book-related site and just cut-and-paste.

Maio 16, 2019, 1:27 pm

>124 Taphophile13: Interesting. Both users joined Spam Fighters...

Maio 16, 2019, 1:36 pm

>125 gilroy: Perhaps they thought there would be some benefit of the doubt if they were members?

Maio 16, 2019, 9:45 pm

>125 gilroy: Well, if you want to keep up on the latest methods, that's the place to be.
Also note, one has one book in their library; the other has six books.

Editado: Maio 17, 2019, 7:48 am

Not immediately obvious as spam, but this "member" created a spam venue for gas boilers (which I've deleted).

ACK! I accidentally put the picture link (gone now) instead of the member. I'm going to hope he's gone, too.

Maio 17, 2019, 1:36 pm

Despite adding a real appearing book, the profile is Spam

see link here:

Maio 20, 2019, 10:53 am

Author set up group to discuss his book:

don't flag profile, I left a note

Maio 20, 2019, 7:25 pm

Editado: Maio 21, 2019, 8:49 am

>131 Taphophile13: The post needs one more flag. (You have to join the group, flag, and then leave the group.)

BTW it seems to be a series of 5 books, and so popular that nobody except the author has entered them.

>132 karenb: Member and review are gone, but not work.

Maio 23, 2019, 6:58 am
Doesn’t seem to be selling anything, but ...

Maio 23, 2019, 7:09 am

>144 haydninvienna: Definitely. The article is specifically from their own website. (Link on the bottom of the post.)

Maio 23, 2019, 7:20 am

>145 gilroy: I saw the link, but I’m decidedly reluctant to click anything that I don’t have reason to trust.

Maio 24, 2019, 7:19 pm

This appears to be an "Enthusiastic Author" and I lack any kindness right now. Soneone else needs to leave the standard comment on his profile. (Needs two more flags, currently)

Editado: Maio 27, 2019, 6:56 pm

Enthusiastic author:

I just posted a standard link, pointing out the rules. The topic still needs flags.

Editado: Maio 28, 2019, 12:15 pm

"tips to write your book" group with link to online essay writing service

new member John Smith?! has catalogued 3 books, so may be legit; don't flag
I've left a note

Maio 28, 2019, 12:16 pm

>152 Taphophile13: Nah! Spam profile. Sometimes cataloguing books is just a flimsy screen.

Editado: Maio 28, 2019, 12:24 pm

>153 2wonderY: yeah, trying to give the benefit of a doubt, but looks suspicious

ETA: and both gone

Editado: Maio 31, 2019, 3:14 pm

I see on his profile that he's already been politely warned...

ETA: He removed the Amazon link from his post.

Maio 31, 2019, 3:43 pm

>157 Marissa_Doyle: He's continuing to post in different groups, same message just without the link.
To me it's still advertising, even though he doesn't include the link...

Maio 31, 2019, 4:06 pm

>157 Marissa_Doyle:
The author involved is, just to have this on record here is he continues to post spam.

Maio 31, 2019, 4:17 pm

Editado: Jun 3, 2019, 2:56 am

What about this bookstore adding several tags with their name to each of their books?

For example on

vintage book collective (1) vintique books (1) vintiquebooks (1) vintique📚books (1)

Jun 3, 2019, 5:28 am

>162 MarthaJeanne: Their entire profile reads as an advertisement. Much as I love bookstores and want to encourage them to remain...

Editado: Jun 3, 2019, 5:38 am

>162 MarthaJeanne:
It looks like they're maybe importing their inventory? Though not listing prices here. (11.5K books added in 3 months)

The URL for their homepage doesn't work, but the URL in one of their tags does ("shop.~.~") They're selling via Biblio

Image on one book includes ad for the store:

Boost to LT management?

Jun 3, 2019, 9:02 am

>162 MarthaJeanne: et al - They sure appear to be using LT solely as a sales platform. As an aside, their assignment of star ratings appears very random too.

Jun 3, 2019, 11:38 am

>162 MarthaJeanne: and etc. I flagged the profile for spam, and I loathe them. They even wrote six (very random) reviews, and reading them made me hate them more. I wonder how many times they could be flagged for spam before it would take???

Yes, I just started drinking coffee, and have no kindness in me. I really think this account needs to be pointed out to the powers that be, and then terminated with extreme prejudice.

Editado: Jun 3, 2019, 12:06 pm

>166 Lyndatrue: I don't see anything in their profile that makes them spammy. Show me the difference between this profile: and the other profile.

>162 MarthaJeanne: tags are sacrosanct user data. "There is no wrong way to use tags."

Editado: Jun 3, 2019, 12:23 pm

Well, except for the fact that the cover image >164 karenb: pointed out is not a one-off. They've done it many times. Take a look in their catalog in the last several pages as cover image and you'll see.

I count 137 spam covers.

Jun 3, 2019, 12:34 pm

>168 2wonderY: They have more than 11K books in their collection. 1.2% are spam covers. Shouldn't they just be given a stern talking at by LT staff?

Jun 3, 2019, 1:38 pm

>167 lesmel: Wait. You're saying this:

About me
We are an independent bookstore in Los Angeles. Our favorite sections are fiction (edgy and gritty), art and design books, McSweeney's books, books on Los Angeles, and the 33 1/3 album series.

You can find out who is reading at our store and order signed books through our website,

About my library
In this LibraryThing library, you will find some of our favorite books, along with recommendations from our staff members. More than anything, we want to help create a better educated reading public.

is identical to this:
Vintage book store collective

(Website redacted)

Fast *FREE* Reliable Shipping (US only) and complementary gift wrap available upon request at time of purchase.

Happy Readings,


Editado: Jun 3, 2019, 2:20 pm

Pretty much. Both have websites. Both provide some info about their store. So do dozens of other profiles on LT.

Jun 4, 2019, 12:59 pm

Despite adding two books, this is a spam profile:

Jun 7, 2019, 9:39 am

>176 andyl: Sorry! I edited my previous post while you were posting.

They're all gone now :-)

Jun 7, 2019, 10:13 am

Just for information's sake, I flagged the member profile AlannnWood (gone now) because all there was on it was an ad for an essay writing service. The random Talk posts appear to have just been meant to direct members to his page.

Jun 7, 2019, 10:21 am

>179 2wonderY: I was keeping an eye on that one too. Though it was extremely funny when they posted that the over-zealous author's book was boring.

Jun 7, 2019, 10:31 am

>180 norabelle414: I assumed that it was a sockpuppet. It's a common trick to create a sockpuppet who attacks your work, giving you an opportunity to talk more about it and get people's sympathy.

Jun 10, 2019, 10:54 am

Esta mensagem foi removida pelo seu autor.

Jun 10, 2019, 12:13 pm

>182 Audaces: Don't know if it's strictly a spammer, but I have to wonder if it's a pirate.

Jun 10, 2019, 12:35 pm

Has anyone clicked on a link?

Jun 10, 2019, 1:22 pm

>184 2wonderY: Nope--I don't click on links if I can help it, but they appears to be a file-sharing site. That's why I'm guessinng pirate.

Jun 10, 2019, 1:28 pm

>182 Audaces: It's possible that this is an engineering library for a small firm or community college that checks out only digital forms of the book. It's possible that the link was supposed to go to comments and got uploaded incorrectly.

I'd get staff involved, let lorannen poke into this, maybe even communicate with the user.

Jun 12, 2019, 7:11 am

Despite the book, the profile is Spam:

Jun 12, 2019, 8:34 am

>186 gilroy: Got it! It sure looks like they're an electronic-resource-lending library, and since they're using TinyCat, there's a much better solution for them to do this (beyond the fact that it's an inappropriate use of the Review field).

Editado: Jun 16, 2019, 1:15 pm (Already dead)

I've got a question. Did I miss something with this guy? I saw one post on a Writer-Reader forum, but nothing that warranted a spam removal...

Jun 17, 2019, 1:02 pm

Tim posted a link that had an example of "Avatars" where you could see who was local. All I noticed is that there were some profiles that were spam, or at least spam-like. (Please flag) (maybe, maybe not) (could be classified as an enthusiastic author, but the profile is old)

I flagged only the first one. Now I feel sorry for all those one-book people, who showed up, looked around, and then left.

Sad business, really.

Jun 17, 2019, 1:45 pm

>193 Lyndatrue: I see that the first profile is gone now, but I would not classify either of the other two as spam. ESPECIALLY not the middle one.

Jun 17, 2019, 2:43 pm

>194 norabelle414: Yeah, me neither. I posted that while drinking my first cup of coffee, and didn't even flag the first one until I'd finished the cup. That middle one is kinda sad, really. Here's the death notice, from the local paper:

Rose L. Sullivan

Rose Lynn Sullivan, 87, of Kennewick, died June 2 (this year) in Kennewick.

She was born in Erwin, S.D., and lived in the Tri-City area for 41 years.

She was a retired teacher for the Pasco School District.

...and the obituary...

There's a photograph with the obituary, and she seems like she was a very sweet and kind person. Wish I'd known her. :-{

Jun 18, 2019, 11:49 am

Over-enthusiastic author:
I'm sure I've run into them before (the link to their profile is in my browser history) but there's no message on their profile. I've left one now.

Jun 18, 2019, 11:52 am

>197 norabelle414: Are we sure that's the author? Name does not match author name, but one or the other may be pseudonym?

Jun 18, 2019, 12:01 pm

>198 davidgn: Pretty sure. The thread writing matches the material available in the look inside the book feature on Amazon.

I started to leave a message, but thought better of it.

Jun 18, 2019, 1:00 pm

>197 norabelle414: I feel like they've been here, left, then came back.

Jun 18, 2019, 7:48 pm

Lifetime member, but joined today and has posted Spam links in Talk thread and two book reviews. Staff may need to be notified. Let's see if flagging gets rid of it.

Jun 18, 2019, 8:12 pm

>203 2wonderY: Could be a lifetime member via the current treasure hunt?

At any rate, have reported to lorannen.

Jun 18, 2019, 8:13 pm

>204 karenb: You get a lifetime membership if you sign up through the app.

Jun 18, 2019, 8:43 pm

>205 amanda4242: Or through TinyCat, which also automatically signs you up for the TinyCat group, which this user is.

Editado: Jun 19, 2019, 1:08 am

Well, I know this seems at first glance to just be a misplaced review, but it's really an effort via (I'm guessing) a translator into English (some of the phrasing is typical).

I flagged the post, and the profile.

Interesting to note that I was not the first flag on that topic.

ETA: ...and gone, clean as a whistle.

Editado: Jun 19, 2019, 2:50 am

Male enhancement:

ETA: I saw this and flagged it, then reported it, but I wonder if there's any point in reporting the "keto" and "male enhancement" ones. Where I am, they tend to appear in the morning and I flag them and they usually last about 10 minutes (as this one did).

Jun 19, 2019, 1:23 pm

>209 haydninvienna: I left them a message

Jun 19, 2019, 1:26 pm

>210 norabelle414: Thanks. I thought of doing so but truth to tell I'm a bit shy/cowardly about engaging with these people.

Jun 19, 2019, 1:39 pm

>211 haydninvienna: I found it intimidating at first, but 99% of people never respond or do anything. In this case the account sent a very nice response, which is unusual.

Jun 19, 2019, 2:39 pm

>203 2wonderY: and >204 karenb: Thanks for messaging me! Got that one!

Jun 20, 2019, 8:16 pm

Author promoting her book:

I've left a message on her profile:

Jun 22, 2019, 2:17 pm

>217 amanda4242: A writer who says they are not a reader is an immediate turn off for me...
Sad, really. They miss out on so much.

Jun 22, 2019, 2:24 pm

>218 gilroy: Yeah, I thought that was kind of weird. They did reply to my PM apologizing and saying they were curious about the site, so maybe maybe we'll get a convert.

Jun 23, 2019, 2:44 pm

Time for a new thread.
Este tópico foi continuado por Spam reporting thread #68.