Carregue numa fotografia para ir para os Livros Google.
A carregar... Angels: A Very Short Introductionpor David Albert Jones
Nenhum(a) A carregar...
Adira ao LibraryThing para descobrir se irá gostar deste livro. Ainda não há conversas na Discussão sobre este livro. sem críticas | adicionar uma crítica
Pertence a Série
What are angels? Where were they first encountered? Can we distinguish angels from gods, fairies, ghosts, and aliens? And why do they remain so popular? This book investigates stories and speculations about angels in religions old and new, in art literature, film, and the popular imagination. Não foram encontradas descrições de bibliotecas. |
Current DiscussionsNenhum(a)Capas populares
Google Books — A carregar... GénerosSistema Decimal de Melvil (DDC)202.15Religions Religion Doctrines Objects of worship and veneration Good spiritsClassificação da Biblioteca do Congresso dos EUA (LCC)AvaliaçãoMédia:
É você?Torne-se num Autor LibraryThing. |
i) late ancient or medieval texts by Pseudo-Dionysus or Aquinas.
ii) contemporary accounts of how angels will stop you getting in car accidents.
Now, wouldn't it be nice if there was something in between? Something that didn't treat you like an idiot, but recognized that you are not a theologian or intellectual historian?
Jones tries to fill that unnecessary gap, and more or less fails. I have no doubt he's a respectable scholar, but he seems to be the kind of respectable scholar who believes that writing for the general public means writing like a freshman who's had three composition seminars:
"In 586 BCE the King of Judah was defeated in battle and Jerusalem was captured by the Babylonians. Many of the people were taken into exile in Babylon. This had a great effect on their religious beliefs, including their beliefs about angels. This was recognized by the Jews themselves."
Note the vagueness (*what* effect?), the unwillingness to follow out a train of thought (*how* did it have an effect?), the 'redrafting' that consists entirely of cutting run-on sentences into multiple sentences, but never rises to the challenge of (gasp!) 'which' clauses.
This wouldn't matter if Jones said anything interesting or informative about angels; you'll only learn something from this book if you've never seen any art, never read any of the old testament, nor quran etc. If you know literally nothing, I admit, this is the book for you, because Jones will tell you important contextual things, for instance, Paul Klee was friends with Kandinsky (p 24; I have no idea why he tells us this), or Revelations is the last book in the new testament.
Enough, before I talk myself into a one star rating. ( )