Página InicialGruposDiscussãoMaisZeitgeist
Pesquisar O Sítio Web
Este sítio web usa «cookies» para fornecer os seus serviços, para melhorar o desempenho, para analítica e (se não estiver autenticado) para publicidade. Ao usar o LibraryThing está a reconhecer que leu e compreende os nossos Termos de Serviço e Política de Privacidade. A sua utilização deste sítio e serviços está sujeita a essas políticas e termos.
Hide this

Resultados dos Livros Google

Carregue numa fotografia para ir para os Livros Google.

The Magic of Reality: How We Know What's…
A carregar...

The Magic of Reality: How We Know What's Really True (original 2011; edição 2011)

por Richard Dawkins (Autor), Dave McKean (Ilustrador)

MembrosCríticasPopularidadeAvaliação médiaMenções
1,594358,542 (4.01)32
The author of "The God delusion" addresses key scientific questions previously explained by rich mythologies, from the evolution of the first humans and the life cycle of stars to the principles of a rainbow and the origins of the universe.
Membro:Joy_Bush
Título:The Magic of Reality: How We Know What's Really True
Autores:Richard Dawkins (Autor)
Outros autores:Dave McKean (Ilustrador)
Informação:Free Press (2011), Edition: First Edition, 272 pages
Colecções:A sua biblioteca
Avaliação:
Etiquetas:to-read

Pormenores da obra

The Magic of Reality: How We Know What's Really True por Richard Dawkins (2011)

Adicionado recentemente porbiblioteca privada, EmilyW916, szarka, richarnd, saRob, Roberto_Ronconi, millerchris3, BoscoBooks, Flynn-Rider
  1. 00
    A Little History of Science por William Bynum (themulhern)
    themulhern: Both books are science books directed at a younger audience. While "A Little History of Science" is mostly descriptive, "The Magic of Reality" is persuasive, and hence more intellectually demanding. It is true that "The Magic of Reality" is not going to convert the anti-scientific, but it's going to help the scientific understand why they have reason to believe the things they do, which as John Stuart Mill pointed out in "On Liberty" is a very valuable sort of knowledge. So, I'ld say that "The Magic of Reality" is the stronger book, but "A Little History of Science" has more facts and history, and is therefore useful in that way.… (mais)
  2. 00
    Astrophysics for Young People in a Hurry por Neil deGrasse Tyson (themulhern)
    themulhern: Two famous authors of popular science try writing for children. Dawkins is much better, however, he never seems to be dumbing it down and he doesn't make the dumb jokes.
  3. 00
    Newton at the Center por Joy Hakim (themulhern)
    themulhern: Both books are about the process of science as well as the facts of science. Both are written for young adults but readily appreciated by fully mature adults.
A carregar...

Adira ao LibraryThing para descobrir se irá gostar deste livro.

Ainda não há conversas na Discussão sobre este livro.

» Ver também 32 menções

Mostrando 1-5 de 35 (seguinte | mostrar todos)
I think "The Magic of Reality", by Richard Dawkins, may have been written as a "Young Adult" or "Y.A." book for inquisitive minds, but it works just as well for adult readers. Dawkins discusses a number of common themes regarding our solar system, our world, ancient myths, evolution, and life on earth. I guess that would place the book in the category of a science book, but Dawkins knows how to provide just enough detail to make things clear without getting technical. Too few students seem to take a fully array of science classes, and "The Magic of Reality" might just whet some appetites for further exploration of the subject. For the adult reader who is familiar with the scientific concepts he discusses, it also makes for a nice review and refresher of these concepts.

( )
  rsutto22 | Jul 15, 2021 |
My favorite part of this book would have to be the artwork, which is as varied as it is creative and beautiful. The illustrator Dave McKean is probably better known as the director of MirrorMask and the main illustrator for Neil Gaiman. Honestly at times the prose felt dry in comparison to the visuals accompanying it. I felt like Richard Dawkins was a bit stiff in parts, like he was trying to fit his writing to his perceived young audience and wasn't sure how to address them. Other times he was passionate and natural so I think that the missteps aren't dealbreakers. His section on evolution was particularly enjoyable and lively. I definitely would recommend this to a science-oriented child. ( )
  jobinsonlis | May 11, 2021 |
While I really liked the idea driving this book, that science provides a sort of magic with their explanations of natural phenomonia, I didn't feel that he followed throught well enough. Be warned, he is a scientist and an athiest. Not that those two are mutually exclusive, I felt that his need to bash religion overshadowed the idea that the reasons behind scientific happening can been seen as miraculous and wonderous in their own right. That being said, I thought his explanations of said happening to be really helpful. ( )
  Colleen5096 | Oct 29, 2020 |
To be sure, I need to be clear as to WHY I like this book. It's not like any of the science or reasoning in it is new or unusual, or that I haven't heard many similar reasonings here or there all the way from high school physics courses all the way to certain and strange movies I've enjoyed.

Why I do love this book is simple: it's clear, concise, and it does a very admirable job of setting up magical thinking in all its flavors against the fundamentals of science.

It's a great primer. I think I would have loved reading this when I was 13 or 14. It might have even sparked my interest in science even more than I had been sparked... but that might not be possible. Science Fiction did a perfectly admirable job in that department, with Heinlein and Asimov as my tutors.

Even so, apart from the things I've heard about of Dawkins, this is relatively mild in the religion bashing. He uses logic and reasoning, postulating clearly and setting up the universe as it is, not as we wish it would be. He also makes sure that Occam's Razor is quite sharp.

I certainly have no complaints about this book, assuming I wanted a basic primer, of course.

As for being an adult reading this? It's charming. It's somewhat magical in the sense that I draw a sense of wonder about the universe and our living within it. For that alone I would recommend it as a bit of light reading, assuming you're up to your science snuff. :) ( )
  bradleyhorner | Jun 1, 2020 |
I would never have expected to have put one of Dawkins' books into my 'unfinished' collection, but I really have no intention of finishing this one. I didn't appreciate when I bought it that it was for children and YA, which in fiction wouldn't be problem for me but I find Dawkins' style here hideously patronising to the extent that I couldn't put up with it any longer. The early parts of the book are also pretty much a rehash of The Ancestor's Tale, which I thoroughly enjoyed a few years ago, but dumbed down for half wits. Pity. ( )
  Only2rs | May 10, 2020 |
Mostrando 1-5 de 35 (seguinte | mostrar todos)
as Richard Dawkins confirms again and again in this book – his first for "a family audience" – science composes stories as thrilling as Homer, as profound as Job, and as entertaining as anything by Kipling.
adicionada por mikeg2 | editarThe Guardian, Tim Radford (Sep 21, 2011)
 

» Adicionar outros autores

Nome do autorPapelTipo de autorObra?Estado
Richard Dawkinsautor principaltodas as ediçõescalculated
McKean, DaveIlustradorautor secundáriotodas as ediçõesconfirmado
Tem de autenticar-se para poder editar dados do Conhecimento Comum.
Para mais ajuda veja a página de ajuda do Conhecimento Comum.
Título canónico
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Título original
Títulos alternativos
Data da publicação original
Pessoas/Personagens
Locais importantes
Acontecimentos importantes
Filmes relacionados
Prémios e menções honrosas
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em russo. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Epígrafe
Dedicatória
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Clinton John Dawkins
1915-2010
O, my beloved father
Primeiras palavras
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Reality is everything that exists.
Citações
Últimas palavras
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Nota de desambiguação
Editores da Editora
Autores de citações elogiosas (normalmente na contracapa do livro)
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Língua original
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
DDC/MDS canónico
Canonical LCC

Referências a esta obra em recursos externos.

Wikipédia em inglês (3)

The author of "The God delusion" addresses key scientific questions previously explained by rich mythologies, from the evolution of the first humans and the life cycle of stars to the principles of a rainbow and the origins of the universe.

Não foram encontradas descrições de bibliotecas.

Descrição do livro
Resumo Haiku

Capas populares

Ligações Rápidas

Géneros

Melvil Decimal System (DDC)

501 — Natural sciences and mathematics General Science Philosophy and theory

Classificação da Biblioteca do Congresso dos EUA (LCC)

Avaliação

Média: (4.01)
0.5
1 4
1.5
2 6
2.5 1
3 36
3.5 20
4 104
4.5 8
5 70

É você?

Torne-se num Autor LibraryThing.

 

Acerca | Contacto | LibraryThing.com | Privacidade/Termos | Ajuda/Perguntas Frequentes | Blogue | Loja | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliotecas Legadas | Primeiros Críticos | Conhecimento Comum | 163,478,963 livros! | Barra de topo: Sempre visível