Read this review, and many more on my blog October Tune!

I’m not sure why I started reading these prequels, but I think I was just really curious about this series. But I’d read very mixed reviews about it. Of course, I wanted to find out for myself if they really were as bad as everyone said, or as awesome as anyone said, and I must admit I have very mixed feelings about these prequels. This review is about the stories Beauty Never Dies, Laddle Rat Rotten Hut and Mary Mary Quite Contrary.

What I liked:

I kind of liked that all the characters were quite different from their Disney (or original Grimm) counterparts. They were all a bit darker, a bit scarier, and I liked that. I would have liked it more if the stories hadn’t been so strange.

What I didn’t like:

For example, there were characters that weren’t at all in Grimm’s fairy tales; like Peter Pan (who was written by J.M. Barrie), The Hunchback of the Notre Dame (who was written by Victor Hugo). It all felt a bit weird having those characters there as well. Also, all the characters sounded like teenagers. Of course, some of them were teenagers (including Peter Pan, who annoyed me deeply by spending several sentences describing how beautiful he was); and Laddle/Little Red Riding Hood from the second story sounded a lot like a little child to me, even though she was sixteen for most of the story. But yeah, if you are writing about grown-up characters, please write them like they’re grown-up and not teenagers.

And there were a lot of references to popular things, like Harry Potter (Peter kept calling Dracula ‘Draco’, like Draco Malfoy, and this one: “[...] reading Harry Potter book twenty-three – you don’t have those on earth, I know. You have to have a membership in Heaven to read those.”); and the above quote (Christoper Lee played Saruman in the Lord of the Rings and the Hobbit). Though I normally like references to things I love, it kind of annoyed me in these prequels. It was almost as if the author wanted people to like his stories by throwing in these random unnecessary references.

There were also some mistakes in these stories. The biggest one, one that really annoyed me, in Beauty Never Dies was that Frankenstein was mentioned several times. But of course, like most people they meant the monster, not Frankenstein himself (Frankenstein was the doctor who CREATED the monster, not the monster itself. I believe that monster had no name). As an author, you’d check these kind of things before publishing something, right?

Yes, I can safely say that I am not really a fan of these Grimm Diaries Prequels, though I will probably keep on reading all of them (all eighteen), just to see if there are some hidden gems in it. ( )

Mary, Mary, quite contrary,
How does your garden grow?
With silver bells, and cockle shells,
And pretty maids all in a row.

Once you read this, you will never see that nursery rhyme the same again!

Happy Reading

-Emily ( )

(Free book from Kindle store.)

I was really disappointed by this story considering that the majority of the characters, including the title character, are not Grimm related. This is the Grimm Diaries, yet few of the hundreds of Grimm characters actually made it into this story. Like in Beauty Never Dies, Jace pulls from a lot of other sources instead of sticking to the Grimm stores. The main story (based on The Snow Queen) of the splinters of the looking glass is from Hans Christian Andersen and the author even attributes the character of the devil to Andersen instead of the Grimm brothers (even through plenty of their tales features the devil as well). Peter Pan and Dracula are also mentioned as in Beauty Never Dies. And Mary Mary Quiet Contrary/ Bloody Mary and Elizabeth Bathory show up as well, none of which have anything to do with the Grimm tales. Rumplestiltskin did make an appearance.

I did like the connections made between Bloody Mary and Bathory with the Queen of Sorrow, but overall I was let down by the lack of Grimm characters. Jace focuses on the big characters from the fairy tales that always seem to be the focus of these sort retellings (Cinderella, Little Red-Cap, Little Briar-Rose, etc.). Interesting new take on the tales, but they're still the same stories that get the most attention.

Also there were a few contradictions that confused me. In this story the devil mentions that he likes squirrels over people because they can't talk, but in Ladle Rat Rotten Hut, Ladle notes that squirrels can talk. I'm assuming they all live in the same universe but some small details didn't line up.

And in this prequel it is revealed that Peter Pan was in Hell, a fact that Peter himself does not alludes to in Beauty Never Dies as far as I remember. It seems like something one would mention at some point.

Similarly to the other prequels, the connections are cool, but the writing doesn't come up to the same level. The rambling conversation between the devil and Rumplestiltskin was silly and dull. ( )