Okay, I read chapters 19-22 of this book, because I wanted to get as much coverage of the Soviet-Afghan War as possible. Yet what I read was far from an unbiased narrative. So far I can see that Sir Roderic Braithwaite's turn-pager is much more balanced and authoritative source on this conflict. Don't know if I should trust the rest of Mr. Ansary's creation. Let me illustrate with just one concrete example. Ansary presents mines mimicking children toys as a diabolical Soviet ploy to undermine Afghan families. Here's the coverage of the same topic by Braithwaite. Draw your own conclusions:

There were stories that both sides used booby traps and explosive devices disguised to look like everyday objects such as watches and pens. Much play was made with the story, which figured in a UN report of 1985 as well as in Western propaganda, that the KGB deliberately designed mines to look like children’s toys, in order to sow a particularly vicious kind of terror among ordinary Afghans. The Russians countered with stories that this was a tactic of the mujahedin and published photographs to back their claim. The story may have had its origin in the tiny ‘butterfly’ mines made of brightly coloured plastic, which were scattered from helicopters along rebel trails and supply routes. They were supposed to deactivate themselves after a given period, but often the deactivation mechanism did not work. But these devices were not the product of the twisted imagination of the KGB’s engineers. They were directly copied from the American Dragontooth BLU-43/B and BLU-44/B mines, used in very large numbers in Indo-China. They were intended to maim rather than to kill, since a wounded soldier is more trouble to his comrades than a dead one. The official name of the Soviet version was PFM-1, but the soldiers called them lepestki (petals). It is not surprising that children should have found them attractive, and that they and their parents should have reported them to journalists as disguised toys. But the experts in the Mine Action Coordination Centre of Afghanistan, whose job it was to know about these things, believed that the story ‘gained a life for obvious journalist reasons – but it has we think no basis in widespread fact’.24

24 - Alan A. H. Macdonald, Chief of Staff , Mine Action Coordination Centre of Afghanistan, email to author, 4 May 2009.

Afgantsy: The Russians In Afghanistan, 1979-1989 by Rodric Braithwaite, рp.234-5

In "Games Without Rules", Tamim Ansary describes the history of modern Afghanistan leading up to the recent war years in the Country. We hear of the strong family, clan, and tribal ties of the Afghan people, and Ansary provides further clarity regarding the deep-seated Afghan traditions and culture and how it impacts the current conflict in the region.
( )

This book was a good balance of armchair historian (simplified and easy to follow) and academic for someone like me, who is relatively educated but out of practice, and completely a noob at knowing anything about the area in question. For me, the light and approachable manner in which this was written was crucial to my understanding. For those with more background, it would be infuriatingly simplistic. For myself I’m very glad I found this book. ( )

This is a book I needed to read if was to get beyond the cable news sound-bites, and slanted political rhetoric of our Central Asian conflicts and Afghanistan in particular. I have previously read several books covering Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan, but they were not comprehensive and were often biased to a particular way. While it is not superbly written, this book is quite competent and fills an important need for anyone wanting a view of the whole. The author was born and raised in Afghanistan, but left and came to America several years ago. The volume is essentially three different works. The first is early Afghanistan history, and the author plays the role of an entertaining and highly personable lecturer on the subject. I found myself wishing I had him teaching me in other classes. As time continues, the events in Afghanistan start to touch on things on which the author's father or other relatives were personally involved or that the author remembers directly from his youth. As such, the narrative starts to take on a more personal, less scholarly tone. Finally, the reporting comes to more recent times, times in which the author was an adult in America, like me, and thus, had cable news, the Internet, and some relatives still in Afghanistan to color his narrative. In essence, if this had been about a sport, like baseball, the early part would have been about things such as how many home runs Babe Ruth had and the later part would have been about what a bum the current Yankee manager was and what they needed to do to win this year's World Series; quite different creatures. In the end, the author fully justifies a simple conclusion about present day Afghanistan: working for a "neutral-Afghanistan-serving-nobody's-interest-fully" or "awful-quagmire-Afghanistan-sucking-down-yet-another-hapless-great-power". He actually offers a solution, but you must read the book to find it and decide for yourself if it is viable. ( )

This is a book which could only be written by someone with a foot in both camps. Tamim Ansary is an Afghan who has spent many years living in America. He produces an excellent book which neither denigrates one, or the other culture and provides an insight to Westerners as to the mindset of the Afghan people.

Mr. Ansary is a realist but, quietly confident that, left to her own devices, Afghanistan will develop into a modern country. This, of course, leads to interesting questions: is it acceptable to stand aside and watch women being exploited because it is for a country to progress at its own speed? Strangely, this seems to be considered permissible but, when South Africa held a racist position, liberal voices did not suggest that we should allow them to come to terms with their racial mix at their own speed. There is a fine line between interfering within another country's affairs, and accepting intolerable behaviour.

This book explains what any rational person must know: that the ordinary Afghan is not a ranting, gun toting thug, desperate to kill the infidels. The most important point of which it reminds us, is one that journalistic shorthand so often leads us to forget - namely, that the Taliban is not a highly organised single military unit, but a term used to cover everyone who stands against the country's government and which ever major power is poking their nose in at the moment. The reasons for dissent may be as varied as the uneducated country folk fearing that the 'sophisticated' townies are destroying the religious beliefs that are held so dear, or an argument between two opium producers.

Tamim Ansary is too wise to wrap this book up with a final chapter setting out a couple of simple stages that will lead to an enlightened Afghanistan living happily ever after, but he does offer a glimmer of hope that things may, slowly, be moving towards a better tomorrow: let us all prey that he is correct. ( )