Badiou invokes or quotes, as opposed to legitimately using, a bit of math to assert (as opposed to demonstrating) a difference between being (ontology) and the event (singularity), and then on that basis insists on (as opposed to persuading us of) the homogeneity of the multiple (in contrast to Deleuze's assertion of its heterogeneity), which I imagine Badiou himself would vaguely connect to a political argument about the hegemony of systems and the revolution as event, but which seems to me to be a clearly immoral philosophy. ( )