Página InicialGruposDiscussãoMaisZeitgeist
Pesquisar O Sítio Web
Este sítio web usa «cookies» para fornecer os seus serviços, para melhorar o desempenho, para analítica e (se não estiver autenticado) para publicidade. Ao usar o LibraryThing está a reconhecer que leu e compreende os nossos Termos de Serviço e Política de Privacidade. A sua utilização deste sítio e serviços está sujeita a essas políticas e termos.

Resultados dos Livros Google

Carregue numa fotografia para ir para os Livros Google.

A carregar...

Final Girl [2015 Film]

por Tyler Shields (Director)

Outros autores: Wes Bentley (Actor), Abigail Breslin (Actor), Cameron Bright (Actor), Francesca Eastwood (Actor), Logan Huffman (Actor)2 mais, Alexander Ludwig (Actor), Reece Thompson (Actor)

MembrosCríticasPopularidadeAvaliação médiaDiscussões
1711,243,384 (1.5)Nenhum(a)
Nenhum(a)
A carregar...

Adira ao LibraryThing para descobrir se irá gostar deste livro.

Ainda não há conversas na Discussão sobre este livro.

I considered buying this one when I spotted it at Walmart. I'm glad I resisted, and not just because it popped up on Netflix a short while later.

The movie starts off by introducing William and Veronica. William took Veronica in when she was an orphaned child. Supposedly he spent the next 12 years training her to be an assassin, except older teen (or young 20s?) Veronica is so bad at fighting and killing people that it seems more likely that she and William twiddled their thumbs for 12 years. William completes Veronica's training by having her unsuccessfully choke several people, including himself, by abandoning her in the woods so that she has to walk eight miles to get back to his car, and by pumping her full of drugs so that she can realize what her greatest fear is. Then comes her true test: killing a group of sociopathic teenage boys who have been taking blonde girls into the woods, hunting them, and killing them.

This movie was a mess. The main thing it had going for it was that it was pretty. Also, the actors did a decent job, considering what they had to work with. Which was a lot of awkward nothing.

First off, the dialogue was awful. It felt very studied and unnatural. It was especially noticeable whenever Wes Bentley (William) spoke – I could practically see him reading off of a script – but there were plenty of other moments that could have used work. For example, when one of the teenage killers succumbed to the drugs Veronica had given him, he kept screaming “You Babylonian whore!” I had no idea why a teenage boy would scream that at visions of his worst nightmare.

Second, there were so many details that went absolutely nowhere. William mentioned that his wife and child had been killed, which initially made me think that he was training Veronica to kill their killer, except that the teens he sent her after were too young to have been involved in their deaths. As a child, Veronica demonstrated both a photographic memory and an ability to instantly find the correct path through a maze she'd only just been shown. Neither of these abilities were ever mentioned again, and if William trained her to use those abilities against her targets, it wasn't shown.

Third, there were a lot of holes. How did William become the guardian of an orphaned child? What did they do during those 12 years before William finally began seriously training her? How did Veronica bother trying to choke one of the teenage killers when she had failed to successfully choke anyone so many times before? And finally, there was that stupid bit where one of the boys mentioned that they mixed up their killing techniques to “throw off the authorities.” I'm sorry, but that must mean the authorities are morons. All the killings happen in the woods near a small town. All the victims are pretty blonde girls who live in that town. Jameson (one of the teenage killers) had publicly demonstrated an interest in all of those girls. Mixing up their killing techniques should have meant nothing in the face of all the other details that were exactly the same from one killing to the next.

Here's Netflix's description of this movie: “A group of sociopaths that's been killing girls in the woods for sport sets its sights on a teen who turns out to be a trained assassin.” This premise sounds kind of awesome, but it's misleading. William's training didn't seem to start until 12 years after he took Veronica in, and his training methods were crap and seemed more focused on messing with Veronica's head than anything. I'm almost certain that the first teenage boy Veronica managed to kill in the woods was her first kill, period, and the only reason she managed to kill any of them was because she drugged them (not a spoiler – this was revealed before the boys made it clear they planned to hunt her down and kill her).

There wasn't even much of a sense of triumph in the end. Most of the boys were so caught up in their drug-fueled nightmares that they weren't even aware of who was trying to kill them. It could have felt like a revenge flick, except that neither Veronica nor William had any personal stakes in the boys being killed and, aside from one scene near the end, there was very little focus on the boys' victims and their need for vengeance.

I can't recommend this movie and, again, I'm glad I didn't buy it. As a horror/thriller, it wasn't particularly scary or intense. If I worried for Veronica, it was only because I knew she wasn't the awesome assassin the movie tried to present her as being. Instead, she was just an emotionally damaged girl who was fixated on William, a man who should never have been allowed to raise her in the first place. Speaking of which, I should probably mention that this movie contained two characters with unhealthy incestuous/semi-incestuous fixations: Veronica, who loved William, her emotionally distant father-figure, and one of the teenage killers, who apparently fantasized about his mother.

(Original review posted on A Library Girl's Familiar Diversions.) ( )
  Familiar_Diversions | Mar 26, 2016 |
sem críticas | adicionar uma crítica

» Adicionar outros autores (11 possíveis)

Nome do autorPapelTipo de autorObra?Estado
Shields, TylerDirectorautor principaltodas as ediçõesconfirmado
Bentley, WesActorautor secundáriotodas as ediçõesconfirmado
Breslin, AbigailActorautor secundáriotodas as ediçõesconfirmado
Bright, CameronActorautor secundáriotodas as ediçõesconfirmado
Eastwood, FrancescaActorautor secundáriotodas as ediçõesconfirmado
Huffman, LoganActorautor secundáriotodas as ediçõesconfirmado
Ludwig, AlexanderActorautor secundáriotodas as ediçõesconfirmado
Thompson, ReeceActorautor secundáriotodas as ediçõesconfirmado
Tem de autenticar-se para poder editar dados do Conhecimento Comum.
Para mais ajuda veja a página de ajuda do Conhecimento Comum.
Título canónico
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Título original
Títulos alternativos
Data da publicação original
Pessoas/Personagens
Locais importantes
Acontecimentos importantes
Filmes relacionados
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Epígrafe
Dedicatória
Primeiras palavras
Citações
Últimas palavras
Nota de desambiguação
Editores da Editora
Autores de citações elogiosas (normalmente na contracapa do livro)
Língua original
DDC/MDS canónico
LCC Canónico

Referências a esta obra em recursos externos.

Wikipédia em inglês

Nenhum(a)

Não foram encontradas descrições de bibliotecas.

Descrição do livro
Resumo Haiku

Current Discussions

Nenhum(a)

Capas populares

Ligações Rápidas

Avaliação

Média: (1.5)
0.5
1
1.5 1
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5

É você?

Torne-se num Autor LibraryThing.

 

Acerca | Contacto | LibraryThing.com | Privacidade/Termos | Ajuda/Perguntas Frequentes | Blogue | Loja | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliotecas Legadas | Primeiros Críticos | Conhecimento Comum | 204,458,299 livros! | Barra de topo: Sempre visível