Página InicialGruposDiscussãoMaisZeitgeist
Pesquisar O Sítio Web
Este sítio web usa «cookies» para fornecer os seus serviços, para melhorar o desempenho, para analítica e (se não estiver autenticado) para publicidade. Ao usar o LibraryThing está a reconhecer que leu e compreende os nossos Termos de Serviço e Política de Privacidade. A sua utilização deste sítio e serviços está sujeita a essas políticas e termos.

Resultados dos Livros Google

Carregue numa fotografia para ir para os Livros Google.

Vox por Christina Dalcher
A carregar...

Vox (edição 2019)

por Christina Dalcher (Autor)

MembrosCríticasPopularidadeAvaliação médiaMenções
1,53311711,714 (3.5)52
On the day the government decrees that women are no longer allowed more than one hundred words per day, Dr. Jean McClellan is in denial. This can't happen here. Not in America. Not to her. This is just the beginning. Soon women are not permitted to hold jobs. Girls are not taught to read or write. Females no longer have a voice. Before, the average person spoke sixteen thousand words each day, but now women have only one hundred to make themselves heard. For herself, her daughter, and every woman silenced, Jean will reclaim her voice.… (mais)
Membro:thereserose5
Título:Vox
Autores:Christina Dalcher (Autor)
Informação:Berkley (2019), Edition: Reprint, 352 pages
Coleções:A sua biblioteca
Avaliação:**
Etiquetas:Nenhum(a)

Informação Sobre a Obra

Vox por Christina Dalcher

  1. 30
    The Handmaid's Tale por Margaret Atwood (vwinsloe)
  2. 20
    Native Tongue por Suzette Haden Elgin (2wonderY)
    2wonderY: Women's right have been removed. They develop a private language. This is a minor classic.
  3. 00
    The Core of the Sun por Johanna Sinisalo (vwinsloe)
A carregar...

Adira ao LibraryThing para descobrir se irá gostar deste livro.

Ainda não há conversas na Discussão sobre este livro.

» Ver também 52 menções

Inglês (113)  Alemão (2)  Espanhol (1)  Piratês (1)  Todas as línguas (117)
Mostrando 1-5 de 117 (seguinte | mostrar todos)
Zox by Christine Dalcher I loved this book. I'm surprised it has only a 3.5 star rating. I considered it in a category with something George Orwell or Margaret Atwood would write. I gave it a 4.5 star rating. ( )
  xono | Mar 21, 2024 |
In a world where women have been silenced, their speech limited to 100 words in a day, one woman is given an opportunity to change things.

I read this book in a day. The world she describes is terrifying. I had a visceral reaction to it. The main character is interesting, so I got on board with the whole thing. I wanted to see what happens with her.

However, there is one major problem that perpetuates this novel: it is not believable. Sorry, even for a dystopia, you can't just shut down your logic muscles and go along with whatever the writer comes up with. The background story of how this world came to be is very weak. I cannot imagine this happening under any conditions in a world which is deliberately very much like our own.

There are inevitable similarities with Atwood's Handmaid's Tale, the TV show even more than the novel. This is not a bad thing. This novel is fresh enough in its own way and it is a good, quick read. At least if you're not digging into it too deep.

But, I wonder, why did Christina Dalcher picked such an important, difficult topic and decided to give it such a superficial treatment? This is not a breezy summer read. I just can't judge it as such.

Although for me this was more a 2 than a 3, I enjoyed parts of this book. It makes for a good book club discussion, despite being so flawed.

SPOILER
The resolution was so unbelievable to me, almost fairy-tale-like. All the characters just manage to conveniently show up in one place? It was laughable.
And the hero of the story of female subjugation is - a man! A man that the main character is cheating on. He even gives her his blessing to go live with her lover.

Also, I wanted to see what exactly happened when Patrick came to that meeting, the reaction of the public, the aftermath... We are given crumbs about the changes that happen after, but it is all very weak and unsatisfying.
( )
  ZeljanaMaricFerli | Mar 4, 2024 |
Vox is set in America where it has been decreed by the government that women are limited to 100 words per day, must only be homemakers and girls are not taught to read.

I enjoyed this book but wanted more. I feel like this could have been truly heartbreaking and terrifying if the story delved a little deeper. I was sad but I could have been sobbing my eyes out. I was reading to see what would happen next but it could have been nerve wracking. There were some interesting points on feminism but it could have been a strong social commentary on the perception of women.

This isn't to say I didn't like the book, because I did. It was sad and tense and thought provoking, I just wouldn't add it to my 4 star reviews. ( )
  Incredibooks | Mar 1, 2024 |
A great read. All too easy to see this happening. ( )
  jilldugaw | Jan 27, 2024 |
Not a fan.

Got this one after a bookseller suggested it even though this type of opppressed woman dystopia book is not really my thing. She swore it was great so I decided to try it and as I suspected I found it irritating. I don't need my fiction to tell me that lots of men (not all men but lots of men) don't have a lot of respect for women and would prefer to go back in time.

I found the writing choppy and the vocabulary of the protagonist kind of lame considering that she's a linguist. I gave up on really paying good attention to detail about halfway through and then a headcold attacked me and my attention span disappeared and I skimmed through most of the action towards the end. I found it hard to follow but I suspect that is more my fault than the author's.

Just not my cup of tea and I knew it going in.

( )
  hmonkeyreads | Jan 25, 2024 |
Mostrando 1-5 de 117 (seguinte | mostrar todos)
Subtlety is not a concern here, and the theme of “wake up!” is hammered home so vigorously that it can feel hectoring. “Not your fault,” a man says to Jean. “But it is,” she thinks. “My fault started two decades ago, the first time I didn’t vote … was too busy to go on [a march].” It’s of a piece with the preposterous setup, the payoff-heavy writing and the casual appropriation of some of humanity’s most heinous instruments of oppression – labour camps, electrified restraints – in the service of a thriller. If Dalcher wants to scare people into waking up, she would do better to send them back to the history books, rather than forward into an overblown, hastily imagined future.
adicionada por -pilgrim- | editarThe Guardian, Carrie O'Grady (Aug 22, 2018)
 

» Adicionar outros autores (9 possíveis)

Nome do autorPapelTipo de autorObra?Estado
Dalcher, Christinaautor principaltodas as ediçõesconfirmado
Aeckerle, SusanneÜbersetzerautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Balkenhol, MarionÜbersetzerautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Whelan, JuliaNarradorautor secundárioalgumas ediçõesconfirmado
Tem de autenticar-se para poder editar dados do Conhecimento Comum.
Para mais ajuda veja a página de ajuda do Conhecimento Comum.
Título canónico
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Título original
Títulos alternativos
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em português do Brasil. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Data da publicação original
Pessoas/Personagens
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Locais importantes
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Acontecimentos importantes
Filmes relacionados
Epígrafe
Dedicatória
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
In memory of Charlie Jones linguist, professor, friend.
Primeiras palavras
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
If anyone told me I could bring down the president, and the Pure Movement, and that incompetent little shit Morgan LeBron in a week’s time, I wouldn’t believe them.
Citações
Últimas palavras
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
(Carregue para mostrar. Atenção: Pode conter revelações sobre o enredo.)
Nota de desambiguação
Editores da Editora
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Autores de citações elogiosas (normalmente na contracapa do livro)
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Língua original
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
DDC/MDS canónico
LCC Canónico

Referências a esta obra em recursos externos.

Wikipédia em inglês

Nenhum(a)

On the day the government decrees that women are no longer allowed more than one hundred words per day, Dr. Jean McClellan is in denial. This can't happen here. Not in America. Not to her. This is just the beginning. Soon women are not permitted to hold jobs. Girls are not taught to read or write. Females no longer have a voice. Before, the average person spoke sixteen thousand words each day, but now women have only one hundred to make themselves heard. For herself, her daughter, and every woman silenced, Jean will reclaim her voice.

Não foram encontradas descrições de bibliotecas.

Descrição do livro
Resumo Haiku

Current Discussions

Nenhum(a)

Capas populares

Ligações Rápidas

Avaliação

Média: (3.5)
0.5 1
1 17
1.5 2
2 43
2.5 8
3 102
3.5 33
4 131
4.5 13
5 63

É você?

Torne-se num Autor LibraryThing.

 

Acerca | Contacto | LibraryThing.com | Privacidade/Termos | Ajuda/Perguntas Frequentes | Blogue | Loja | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliotecas Legadas | Primeiros Críticos | Conhecimento Comum | 204,238,113 livros! | Barra de topo: Sempre visível