Carregue numa fotografia para ir para os Livros Google.
A carregar... Black Easter (1968)por James Blish
A carregar...
Adira ao LibraryThing para descobrir se irá gostar deste livro.
Having been a long-time fan of science fiction with religious themes, I inevitably got around to this one. I found it...well, a strange book. It's of the era when writers packed their ideas into modestly sized novels instead of exhausting themselves (or the reader) in 700-page "worlds." That said, there were chapters here that begged for some follow-up. It had a strangely disjointed feel that, in retrospect, may well have added to its impact. What if magic were a "real science?" What if there were ground rules and boundaries which both sides honored in the ongoing conflict between the sacred and the satanic? Armageddon precipitated by a straightforward business deal? Hmmm, maybe this isn't science fiction after all... What Dracula and King's Salem's Lot is to vampires, Black Easter is to demons. These days, vampires, witches and wizards are lovable creatures in fiction. There are even neo-Pagans today who embrace a belief in ceremonial magic as benign. Blish says in his Author's Note that every one of the "novels, poems and plays about magic and witchcraft" he's read treat it as "romantic or playful." He sought to write a treatment that "neither romanticizes magic nor treats it as a game." His book is dedicated to C.S. Lewis and even includes an extensive quotation from his Screwtape Letters heading one of the chapters. So although I'm not sure I'd classify this as out and out Christian fiction, this does come out of that world view and takes the demonic seriously--that's what does make it unusual and at times fascinating. It's obvious not just from his note but the vividness of his details and even the quotes heading chapters Blish did extensive research--actually reading grimoires and manuscripts on ceremonial magic. Blish is best known as a science fiction author, and he gives his magicians a grounding that really makes if feel as rigorous as any science--and it's obviously an allegory for amoral science and its destructive power. The world building in that regard is first class, which is why I'm not rating it lower. The characters not so much--and the plot feels a bit thin. I never found it scary, nor was scared for the characters, and the ending, which I thought predictable, didn't have much impact upon me. Also, I had read this before--albeit over a decade ago--but it didn't make enough of an impression to really be memorable--thus why I'm not rating it higher. sem críticas | adicionar uma crítica
Pertence a SérieAfter Such Knowledge (2.1) Pertence à Série da EditoraColecção Argonauta (433) Pocket (5432) SF Rediscovery (27) PrémiosNotable Lists
A gripping story about primal evil: a sinister intermingling of power, politics, modern theology, the dark forces of necromancy, and what proves, all too terribly, not to be superstition. Não foram encontradas descrições de bibliotecas. |
Current DiscussionsNenhum(a)Capas populares
Google Books — A carregar... GénerosSistema Decimal de Melvil (DDC)813.54Literature English (North America) American fiction 20th Century 1945-1999Classificação da Biblioteca do Congresso dos EUA (LCC)AvaliaçãoMédia:
É você?Torne-se num Autor LibraryThing. |
Read as part of the After Such Knowledge omnibus and posted as an individual review as all the other GR reviews are under the individual books. ( )