Carregue numa fotografia para ir para os Livros Google.
A carregar... Running on Emptiness: The Pathology of Civilizationpor John Zerzan
Nenhum(a) A carregar...
Adira ao LibraryThing para descobrir se irá gostar deste livro. Ainda não há conversas na Discussão sobre este livro. Sisällyksestä: Introduction, by Theresa Kintz; Running on Emptiness: the Failure of Symbolic Thought; Time and Its Discontents; Against Technology; That Thing We Do; Enemy of the State; Abstract Expressionism: Painting as Vision and Critique; The Age of Nihilism; Postscript to Future Primitive re the Transition; Age of Grief; In Memoriam; Why I Hate Star Trek; PBS, Power, and Postmodernism; Who is Chomsky?; “Hakim Bey,” Postmodern “Anarchist”; City of Light; We All Live in Waco; Whose Unabomber?; Domestication News; We Have to Dismantle All This; He Means it. Do You?; How Ruinous Does It Have to Get? How Postmodernism Greases the Rails; So…How Did You Become an Anarchist? No Way Out? sem críticas | adicionar uma crítica
America's most famous anarchist. Não foram encontradas descrições de bibliotecas. |
Current DiscussionsNenhum(a)Capas populares
Google Books — A carregar... GénerosSistema Decimal de Melvil (DDC)320Social sciences Political Science Political ScienceClassificação da Biblioteca do Congresso dos EUA (LCC)AvaliaçãoMédia:
É você?Torne-se num Autor LibraryThing. |
I disagreed of course with Zerzan's ad hominem attack on Chomsky; it's fine to take issue with his linguistic theories--I do as well, and for reasons not dissimilar to Zerzan's. It's also okay to disagree on fundamentals about Chomsky's degree of commitment to anarchism and its ideals, although I'd point out that Noam has written and spoken about his anarchism as an ideal achievable only after a profound spiritual transformation of humanity--which is what Zerzan himself suggests is necessary. Criticizing Chomsky as a phony anarchist because he's currently for strengthening the federal government makes sense--there is a ring of 'dictatorship of the proletariat' about the idea--but in the face of an unprecedented assault on human rights by corporate power, it's not completely wrong-headed to suggest a strengthening of the one institution that can protect us from pillage.
Zerzan says Chomsky doesn't give a shit about women's rights or minority rights or the environment because he focuses on foreign policy; this displays complete ignorance of Chomsky's writings and speeches. Chomsky focuses on foreign policy because it's the area where most Americans are most deluded about our true role in the world, but civil and human rights and women's rights are always primary in his books, as is environmental degradation. I'm sure there are many anarchists who regard Zerzan as a poseur because he doesn't loft bombs at Bill Gates. ( )