Página InicialGruposDiscussãoMaisZeitgeist
Pesquisar O Sítio Web
Este sítio web usa «cookies» para fornecer os seus serviços, para melhorar o desempenho, para analítica e (se não estiver autenticado) para publicidade. Ao usar o LibraryThing está a reconhecer que leu e compreende os nossos Termos de Serviço e Política de Privacidade. A sua utilização deste sítio e serviços está sujeita a essas políticas e termos.

Resultados dos Livros Google

Carregue numa fotografia para ir para os Livros Google.

Rising Up and Rising Down: Some Thoughts on…
A carregar...

Rising Up and Rising Down: Some Thoughts on Violence, Freedom and Urgent Means (original 2004; edição 2005)

por William T. Vollmann (Autor)

MembrosCríticasPopularidadeAvaliação médiaMenções
658934,942 (4.16)30
An abridged edition of the author's seven-volume work on the possible justification of violence is based on his war-zone observations and draws on the theories of philosophers, theologians, military strategists, and other thinkers.
Membro:haarpsichord
Título:Rising Up and Rising Down: Some Thoughts on Violence, Freedom and Urgent Means
Autores:William T. Vollmann (Autor)
Informação:Ecco (2005), Edition: Reprint, 752 pages
Coleções:A sua biblioteca
Avaliação:
Etiquetas:to-read

Informação Sobre a Obra

Rising Up and Rising Down: Some Thoughts on Violence, Freedom and Urgent Means {abridged} por William T. Vollmann (2004)

Nenhum(a)
A carregar...

Adira ao LibraryThing para descobrir se irá gostar deste livro.

Ainda não há conversas na Discussão sobre este livro.

» Ver também 30 menções

Mostrando 1-5 de 9 (seguinte | mostrar todos)
The moral calculus was a slog, and the case studies a bit less so, the latter due to what felt like going on too long. (But then again, doesn't perpetual violence always feel like—and isn't it really—too long?) Most of the rest of the book, though, was fascinating in a way I can't fully describe, which in addition to actually being a good thing for reading purposes, may also get at why we can't just make neat categories or judgments about violence and call it a day. ( )
  KatrinkaV | Jan 20, 2024 |
I'm not through...it's 7000 pages. ( )
  Adammmmm | Sep 10, 2019 |
highly recommended.
  theflyingbrick | Aug 25, 2011 |
I really could not get into this. Actually it seems to be a grab bag of ideas. ( )
  carterchristian1 | Aug 27, 2010 |
I almost never do this, but I am going to set this one aside without finishing it. It is a 700 page abbreviated version of a much longer work (which, believe it or not, was actually published) that sets out to use detailed case studies and inductive reasoning to develop a comprehensive moral calculus on the use of violence. It's an audacious idea, and the writer is very talented, but I decided about a hundred pages in that finishing it would just not be worth the effort. The first big hint that ...more I almost never do this, but I am going to set this one aside without finishing it. It is a 700 page abbreviated version of a much longer work (which, believe it or not, was actually published) that sets out to use detailed case studies and inductive reasoning to develop a comprehensive moral calculus on the use of violence. It's an audacious idea, and the writer is very talented, but I decided about a hundred pages in that finishing it would just not be worth the effort. The first big hint that such might be the case was an early example that he intended as an illustration that social context plays a big role in determining the impact of a given action -- a point I agree with, in general -- that amounted to him dismissing the trauma experienced by a female friend from an instance of sexual assault. Yuck. He has thought hard and read broadly, and he includes serious engagement with important figures from the left, but...well, he proclaims a project grounded in examples and attention to intent and respect for cotnext, but at least what I read before I set it aside did not feel like it tried to enact those things at all like I would. And there are ways where he includes himself very visibly and openly in the text, which I approve of, but more in a way that allows him to include lots of colourful (and well written) detail and texture than as an act of taking responsibility for one's place in social relations as one acts and makes judgments. The very act of trying to construct a comprehensive moral calculus of violence is an indulgence in a kind of liberal-democratic hubris, a kind of unilateral declaration of how "I" relates to all the rest of humanity, a kind of claim that certain kinds of judgment can ultimately be reduced to reason alone provided a sufficiently clever and hardworking privileged man makes the effort. So, yeah...no thanks
  scott.neigh | Jun 5, 2010 |
Mostrando 1-5 de 9 (seguinte | mostrar todos)
The author says he spent nearly 20 years writing ''Rising Up and Rising Down.'' It is the product of a restless spirit that is driven -- for reasons that never become clear, that the text itself never really reflects upon -- to put the body in harm's way. All the threads ultimately converge on the ''Moral Calculus,'' which consists of a set of numbered propositions. With its intricately layered structure and its internal cross-references, it seems an attempt to find or impose some stability on a world that the rest of the book suggests may be hopelessly insane.

....

While his convoluted philosophizing suggests a deep ambivalence about the legitimacy of violence, the prose itself suggests that Vollmann's effort to create a moral system is actually a pretext for exploring his fascination with the aesthetic dimensions of carnage and its instruments. Either form of contemplation (moral or aesthetic) renders weapons and corpses into emblems of ultimate truth. ''The real aim of violence,'' he writes, ''is to conquer, direct, instruct, mark, warn, punish, injure, suppress, reduce, destroy or obliterate the consciousness within the body.'' He describes the uncanny fascination of gazing upon a corpse -- ''something with my form and shape'' but with ''no volition to give it buoyancy.''
adicionada por dchaikin | editarNew York Times, SCOTT McLEMEE (Mar 7, 2004)
 
Tem de autenticar-se para poder editar dados do Conhecimento Comum.
Para mais ajuda veja a página de ajuda do Conhecimento Comum.
Título canónico
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Título original
Títulos alternativos
Data da publicação original
Pessoas/Personagens
Locais importantes
Acontecimentos importantes
Filmes relacionados
Epígrafe
Dedicatória
Primeiras palavras
Citações
Últimas palavras
Nota de desambiguação
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
Please distinguish among this authorized, abridged edition, Rising Up and Rising Down (2004), and William Vollmann's 3,000-page, seven volume Work of the same title (2003). Thank you.
Editores da Editora
Autores de citações elogiosas (normalmente na contracapa do livro)
Língua original
DDC/MDS canónico
LCC Canónico

Referências a esta obra em recursos externos.

Wikipédia em inglês

Nenhum(a)

An abridged edition of the author's seven-volume work on the possible justification of violence is based on his war-zone observations and draws on the theories of philosophers, theologians, military strategists, and other thinkers.

Não foram encontradas descrições de bibliotecas.

Descrição do livro
Resumo Haiku

Current Discussions

Nenhum(a)

Capas populares

Ligações Rápidas

Avaliação

Média: (4.16)
0.5
1
1.5
2 3
2.5
3 7
3.5 1
4 16
4.5 3
5 20

É você?

Torne-se num Autor LibraryThing.

 

Acerca | Contacto | LibraryThing.com | Privacidade/Termos | Ajuda/Perguntas Frequentes | Blogue | Loja | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliotecas Legadas | Primeiros Críticos | Conhecimento Comum | 203,202,899 livros! | Barra de topo: Sempre visível