

A carregar... The fatal shore : a history of the transportation of convicts to… (original 1986; edição 1986)por Robert Hughes
Pormenores da obraThe Fatal Shore por Robert Hughes (1986)
![]()
Top Five Books of 2013 (777) » 7 mais Ainda não há conversas na Discussão sobre este livro. In which Mr Hughes destroys most of the myths Australians tell ourselves, whether conservative ("we're not really descended from convicts") or, more usually, progressive ("the convicts were mostly political refugees"... nope. "The convicts and the indigenous peoples worked together to..." nope.) And does it in a highly entertaining narrative. It really isn't over-rated, though it is, perhaps, overlong. ( ![]() Here's another thing about Australia. It has its priorities right. So, when I heard Greece is in some trouble, the consequences of which might destablise the world economy, I went to ABC.net to check it out. Not a WORD about Greece. Honestly, I don't see what all the fuss is about. The really top world news stories are: Lleyton Hewitt out of Wimbledon A person who was born in Australia (ie tenuous connection, but we still want him) has made the NBA draft. Cocaine still popular in the US and the real biggie: Grave fears - GRAVE FEARS, in case you don't register the import of this story - held for lost Emperor Penguin. Presumably this story has pushed Greece off the front page in other parts of the world? SURELY. This penguin took a wrong turn at Albuquerque, on his way to Antarctica and ended up in New Zealand. What could be more important than that? I think we can add another question to the binary decision making tree for Aussies: New Zealand? Or Antaractica? Hmm. Ummm...I dunno. This one's kinda tricky. ----------- I've been thinking about I Ching lately and I can see that in a way, maybe it helps people focus on thinking about their decisions in life. But I can't see it working for Australians. As Stewart Lee said recently, of all the places in the world to have compulsory voting, it's one whose population survives on the following binary tree of decision-making: Get out of bed in the morning? Or not? Shorts? Or trunks? Sit in the shade? Or in the sun? Beach? Or pool? Fosters? Or Carlton? The moment you add a complication to this. Say, Hang out with mates? Or girlfriend? Or both? The moment you do that, they are already looking lost. And as we really don't have a two-party system any more, we really have to get rid of the whole compulsory voting thing. Or do we? Here's another thing about Australia. It has its priorities right. So, when I heard Greece is in some trouble, the consequences of which might destablise the world economy, I went to ABC.net to check it out. Not a WORD about Greece. Honestly, I don't see what all the fuss is about. The really top world news stories are: Lleyton Hewitt out of Wimbledon A person who was born in Australia (ie tenuous connection, but we still want him) has made the NBA draft. Cocaine still popular in the US and the real biggie: Grave fears - GRAVE FEARS, in case you don't register the import of this story - held for lost Emperor Penguin. Presumably this story has pushed Greece off the front page in other parts of the world? SURELY. This penguin took a wrong turn at Albuquerque, on his way to Antarctica and ended up in New Zealand. What could be more important than that? I think we can add another question to the binary decision making tree for Aussies: New Zealand? Or Antaractica? Hmm. Ummm...I dunno. This one's kinda tricky. ----------- I've been thinking about I Ching lately and I can see that in a way, maybe it helps people focus on thinking about their decisions in life. But I can't see it working for Australians. As Stewart Lee said recently, of all the places in the world to have compulsory voting, it's one whose population survives on the following binary tree of decision-making: Get out of bed in the morning? Or not? Shorts? Or trunks? Sit in the shade? Or in the sun? Beach? Or pool? Fosters? Or Carlton? The moment you add a complication to this. Say, Hang out with mates? Or girlfriend? Or both? The moment you do that, they are already looking lost. And as we really don't have a two-party system any more, we really have to get rid of the whole compulsory voting thing. Or do we? DNF It was a first-rate read, though I found that it plods in a few places. The narrative gets thick here and there. Historians and critics can't always help themselves, I guess. The most interesting thing about the history of Australia -- I found -- is that after closure of the British penal colony, after gaining independence, almost the first thing the new Australian government did was establish its OWN penal system. As Art Linkletter used to say: People are funny.
Hughes' descriptions of sadism and suffering, desperate escape attempts, rape, murder, cannibalism, and forays into the bush to exterminate the aboriginal and other indigenous peoples, become, in their accumulation, wearying, mind-numbing. Yet it is the story of the founding of a modern nation whose development was coetaneous with the last century of America's slave period, if even more savage and barbaric. "The Fatal Shore" is an unexpected, original and important work of history. Hughes might have attempted this book in his youth, and got the story out of proportion, even if he had not skimped it. Fortunately, he has made The Fatal Shore the magnum opus of his maturity. By now his sense of historical scale is sound, as for this task it needed to be. It would have been easy to call the Australian system of penal settlements a Gulag Archipelago before the fact. The term ‘concentration camp’, in its full modern sense, would not have been out of place: at least one of the system’s satellites, Norfolk Island, was, if not an out-and-out extermination camp, certainly designed to make its victims long for death, like Dachau in those awful years before the war when the idea was not so much to kill people as to see how much they could suffer and still want to stay alive. And, indeed, Hughes draws these parallels. The analogies are inescapable. But he doesn’t let them do his thinking for him. He is able to bring out the full dimensions of the tragedy while keeping it in perspective. The penal colony surely prefigured the modern totalitarian catastrophe... When there was no one else left to absorb, the real Hughes might have emerged, as happened in his prose. In those years, you could always tell what he had been reading the day before. Even today, he is a magpie for vocables: no shimmering word he spots in any of the languages he understands, and in several more that he doesn’t, is safe from being plucked loose and flown back to his nest. Omnivorous rather than eclectic, that type of curiosity is the slowest to find coherence. But his fluency was always his own, and by persistence he has arrived at a solidity to match it: a disciplined style that controls without crippling all that early virtuosity, and blessedly also contains his keen glance, getting the whole picture into a phrase the way he once got his fellow-students’ faces into a single racing line. It is exactly right, as well as funny, to call a merino sheep ‘a pompous ambling peruke’. Scores of such felicities could be picked out, but only on the understanding that they are not the book’s decoration. They are its architecture. In the early 1970's, while filming a television program on Australian art in Port Arthur, Tasmania, the Australian-born art critic Robert Hughes became curious about the city's prisons, which date from the period (1788-1868) when criminals were shipped from the British Isles to Australia. The prisons are ''the monuments of Australia - the Paestums,'' he said recently in his New York apartment, and the period ''was an extraordinary time - an effort to exile en masse a whole class. The English felt that just as shoemakers make shoes, this class produced crime.'' Belongs to Publisher Series
Referências a esta obra em recursos externos.
|
![]() Capas popularesAvaliaçãoMédia:![]()
É você?Torne-se num Autor LibraryThing. |