Carregue numa fotografia para ir para os Livros Google.
A carregar... Mad, Bad and Sad: A History of Women and the Mind Doctors from 1800 (original 2007; edição 2009)por Lisa Appignanesi
Informação Sobre a ObraMad, Bad and Sad: A History of Women and the Mind Doctors from 1800 por Lisa Appignanesi (2007)
Nenhum(a) A carregar...
Adira ao LibraryThing para descobrir se irá gostar deste livro. Ainda não há conversas na Discussão sobre este livro. It took me a long time to read this book. But I found the topic important enough to finish it. Luckily, the writing style of the author is not heayy. She has an easy pen. The author wants to give an overview of the history of women's mentall illness in different countries, starting from 1796 onwards. Next to it she wants tot describe important scientists who developed treats and cures and built mental hospitals. Also she describes cases of well known artists who struggled with mental illness. And how society through the ages labeled madness in different terms. And of course the overall influence of the theory of Freud. She has no systematical or methodological approach which makes that the study feels like a water head. And it ends with a complaint about the way the prescription of medicines have taken over the cure by therapeutical talk. Although I know it is all very subjective, I feel sympathy for her points. ( ) Appignanesi chronicles the history of mental illness and women from the time when mental illness first became thought of as something that actually could be treated. At first, hospitals for the mentally ill were nothing more than storage facilities to keep the patient out of the families hair. Gradually, however, doctors came to feel that treatments, from isolation rooms to Freud’s ‘talking cure’ to ECT to all the assorted drugs, old and new. There have always been more female mental patients than male, and they have been treated differently most of the time. The author intersperses the history of the treatment of mental illness with biographies of both famous patients and therapists, along with some chapters that focus ‘trends’ in mental illness. I say trends for lack of a better word; I speak of the way an illness is discovered and defined and then is what therapists concentrate of – wandering uteri, cold mothering, repressed memories, giving everyone SSRIs. While the material is all interesting, this approach seems scattered and sometimes hard to follow. I had the feeling that the author could have made two books out of this one. One thing is clear: how mental illness in women is perceived and treated is very much dependant on the sociology of their time. At first, they were told to stay away from reading and learning- something male patients of the time were not told. At another time, they received a great deal of talk therapy. Now they are given pills to cure it all, just as the male patients are. I gave this book a generous three stars and I am very conflicted about how to rate or review this book. Although there were some fascinating case studies discussed in the book - Marilyn Monroe, Zelda Fitzgerald, Mary Lamb, Alice James, Sylvia Plath, Freud & Jung's women - the book's structure (or lack thereof) really bothered me and made for an aimless, disjointed reading experience. I could never really discern a clear thesis or point behind all the information that was being thrown at me, or whether the focus was on doctors, patients, medical treatments, or theories and ideologies. At some point in the last 1/3 of the book, it becomes blatantly clear that the author has an agenda - defending Freudian pyschoanalysis as the optimal treatment method for what we now call "mental illness" and denigrating against the "medicalization" of the mind and behavioralism. There is certainly a case to be made that SSRI's are not a magic bullet, but the author doesn't even seem to be trying for objectivity near the end of the book. I read Elaine Showalter's The Female Malady earlier in the year, and I had thought this book would be a nice follow-on that covered a slightly more current time period than Showalter's book, which was written in the 1970s. Appignanesi's book has a slightly different focus than Showalter's but for the most part she treads over familiar territory - societies throughout history have discerned and labelled mental illness in women on the basis of then-contemporary ideas of appropriate and inappropriate roles, behaviors, and aspirations for women; the emergence of a new type of mental illness in a specific time and place reflects the social and political anxieties of that time and place, rather than anything that "is". Representations of mental illness (Showalter discusses literary representations, Appignanesi focuses on the DSM and internet support sites) in popular culture provide a guide (Showalter claims doctors often diagnosed and posed their patients in conformity with literary representations of madness, Appignanesi argues that patients themselves consciously or unconsciously "ape" the symptoms of a disease they have read about). This book really didn't go beyond Showalter analytically and even ends on almost exactly the same note as Showalter's book, however, the ending comes off considerably weaker (because we've read these words before and we know now what Showalter didn't when she finished her book - that the increased entry of women into the mental health field has not really changed the balance of power between women and the medical establishment in most ways). Read Showalter instead. Or Foucault. This well researched and wide-ranging book examines the history of the ways in which women’s minds have been viewed and treated by medical professionals. Lisa Appignanesi tells the story of women’s madness, badness and sadness and how mind doctors have understood these states of mind over the past two hundred years. Appignanesi was compelled to delve into the history of mental disorders in women by the startling recent statistics of the prevalence of mental illness in women and also the surge in treatments that are said to cure madness, such as antidepressants. The author focuses on women as they are more likely to be diagnosed as mentally ill than men, and also because there has been a strong focus on madness in women through feminist theoretical history. Appignanesi also aimed to examine whether the growing number of women who are now mental health professionals has helped change the ways in which women are treated by the mental health industry. The section of the book that focuses on the present ways in which madness, badness and sadness are conceptualised in women is particularly useful, with the author providing an insightful section on how abuse impacts women’s mental health. Reviewed here. sem críticas | adicionar uma crítica
Mad, bad and sad. From the depression suffered by Virginia Woolf and Sylvia Plath to the mental anguish and addictions of iconic beauties Zelda Fitzgerald and Marilyn Monroe. From Freud and Jung and the radical breakthroughs of psychoanalysis to Lacan's construction of a modern movement and the new women-centred therapies. This is the story of how we have understood mental disorders and extreme states of mind in women over the last two hundred years and how we conceive of them today, when more and more of our inner life and emotions have become a matter for medics and therapists. Não foram encontradas descrições de bibliotecas. |
Current DiscussionsNenhum(a)Capas populares
Google Books — A carregar... GénerosSistema Decimal de Melvil (DDC)616.890082Technology Medicine and health Diseases Diseases of nervous system and mental disorders Mental disordersClassificação da Biblioteca do Congresso dos EUA (LCC)AvaliaçãoMédia:
É você?Torne-se num Autor LibraryThing. |