Página InicialGruposDiscussãoMaisZeitgeist
Pesquisar O Sítio Web
Este sítio web usa «cookies» para fornecer os seus serviços, para melhorar o desempenho, para analítica e (se não estiver autenticado) para publicidade. Ao usar o LibraryThing está a reconhecer que leu e compreende os nossos Termos de Serviço e Política de Privacidade. A sua utilização deste sítio e serviços está sujeita a essas políticas e termos.

Resultados dos Livros Google

Carregue numa fotografia para ir para os Livros Google.

A carregar...

Occidentalism: The West in the Eyes of Its Enemies

por Ian Buruma, Avishai Margalit

MembrosCríticasPopularidadeAvaliação médiaMenções
614737,956 (3.6)28
"Twenty-five years after Edward Said's Orientalism, a whole field of study has developed to analyze and interpret the denigrating fantasies of the exotic "East" that sustained the colonial mind. But what about the fantasies of "the West" in the eyes of our self-proclaimed enemies? Those remain largely unexamined and, as Ian Buruma and Avishai Margalit argue, woefully misunderstood." "This investigation into the dreams and stereotypes of the Western world that fuel hatred in the hearts of Al Qaeda and its ilk argues that the origins of those dreams lie in the West itself. The anti-Western virus has found a ready host in the Islamic world for a number of reasons, but it is not native there. The West that these jihadis imagine themselves fighting is the same menace that has haunted the thoughts of revolutionary groups since the early nineteenth century. Occidentalism identifies its main oppositions - the timid, soft bourgeois versus the heroic revolutionary; the machine society versus the organically knit one of "blood and soil"; the sterile Western mind, all reason and no soul, versus the "inner life" of the spirit - and provides a new conceptual framework for understanding them, as we must to face the world's most pressing issues."--Jacket.… (mais)
A carregar...

Adira ao LibraryThing para descobrir se irá gostar deste livro.

Ainda não há conversas na Discussão sobre este livro.

» Ver também 28 menções

Mostrando 1-5 de 7 (seguinte | mostrar todos)
A nicely done primer that introduces the average reader to the origins of over two century's of anti western thought. Insightful views into the habits and state of mind that have driven some the Wests most implacable foes. ( )
  skid0612 | Mar 21, 2024 |
Dit boekje bracht me enigszins in verwarring. Ik las dit onmiddellijk na ‘Oriëntalisme’ van Edward Said, het geroemde en verguisde boek dat blootlegde hoe in de Westerse cultuur een denigrerend beeld van het Oosten was ontstaan dat de bron en rechtvaardiging vormde voor kolonialisme en imperialisme. Met een titel als ‘Occidentalism’ verwacht je een uiteenzetting over de omgekeerde beweging, en Buruma en Margalit verwijzen daar in hun inleiding ook naar. En inderdaad: ze zoomen in op diverse historische voorbeelden van verzet tegen het Westen, dat gebaseerd is op een beeld van dat Westen als inhumaan, barbaars en zielloos. Los van de vraag of dit beeld klopt, is het inderdaad een vaststelling dat bijvoorbeeld Russische slavofielen in de 19de eeuw, de Japanse militaristische nationalisten in de jaren 1930-1940 en de huidige moslimfundamentalisten dat beeld koester(d)en en gebruik(t)en als verantwoording voor hun strijd.

Buruma en Margalit stellen paradoxaal genoeg vast dat die ‘Westen-haters’ in vele gevallen nieta alleen zelf voluit de Westerse technologie overnemen, maar ideologisch ook erg geïnspireerd zijn door Westerse denkers: de Japanners door het fascisme en nazisme, de moslimfundamentalisten heel dikwijls door marxistische denkkaders. Ze zijn zeker niet de eersten die die paradox vaststellen. Het anti-Westers verzet mag dan dikwijls voorgesteld worden als een teruggrijpen naar de eigen, oorspronkelijke cultuur, het is duidelijk door datzelfde Westen ‘besmet’.

Wat me erg opviel en bevreemde is dat Buruma en Margalit voortdurend de denkers van Duitse Romantiek uit de 18de en 19de eeuw opvoeren als bron van het Occidentalisme. En in dezelfde lijn noemen ze Hitler en het nazisme de ergste exponenten ervan. Pardon? Dat is toch even slikken. Want beiden zijn toch Westers tot en met? We zitten hier met een conceptuele knoop. Want het is duidelijk dat Buruma en Margalit Occidentalisme, haat tegen het Westen, op dezelfde hoop gooien als anti-modernisme, verzet tegen de moderniteit zoals die het eerst in het Westen vorm heeft gekregen. Uiteraard is er verwantschap tussen de twee en vandaar de verwarring. Maar het zou toch beter zijn een zeker onderscheid te maken. Dat zou op zijn minst al duidelijk maken dat niet alleen de Duitse romantiek de bron is van Occidentalisme, maar dat er ook in Frankrijk en Groot-Brittannië behoorlijk wat denkers en literatoren waren met reactionaire trekjes (Buruma en Margalit lijken zich in dit boekje wel erg anti-germaans op te stellen, een vorm van “Germanotalisme”?).

Dit boekje worstelt met een conceptuele knoop, dat is duidelijk, en vandaar dat het niet te verwonderen is dat een term als ‘Occidentalisme’ nooit is aangeslagen. Maar uiteraard legt het wel de bijzonder complexe en paradoxale kant bloot van de verwevenheid tussen haat tegen het Westen en verzet tegen de moderniteit, en de overname van modernistische/Westerse denkkaders. In dit interessant, maar toch te slordig geschreven boek ga je daar geen sluitende antwoorden over krijgen. ( )
  bookomaniac | Apr 28, 2019 |
There are some interesting tidbits of the history of ideas here, but they are woven into an oddly unbalanced and decontextualized story. I'm kind of mad at the authors for taking this title for a book that doesn't live up to its promise. Occidentalism ought to be a book that looks at Occidentalism as the obverse of Orientalism, showing the parallels in these stereotyped ways of seeing the other while also surveying the material and intellectual contexts in which these ways of thinking arose.

The worst part of this book is that, as a review in The Guardian notes, Buruma and Margalit give the impression that the ways of thinking they describe are almost wholly imported from Europe, thereby implicitly denying the capacity of Eastern intellectuals to think for themselves.

The best part of the book is the chapter on anti-cosmopolitanism as an intellectual trend stretching across time and geography. I also appreciate the recognition that the ways of thinking that the authors call "Occidentalism" (a misnomer, as far as I'm concerned) are currently present not only among radical Islamists in the East but also among fundamentalist Christians in the West, although I'd have liked that to be made more explicit. ( )
1 vote pattricejones | Dec 26, 2011 |
An important look at the concept of Occidentalism, in short, the idea that everything bad can be traced to western civilization and the Enlightenment values it embodies. The authors have put together an interesting and easy to read discussion of the basic tenets of what they are calling Occidentalism, but unfortunately, the analysis is a bit superficial. It's an interesting book, but one is left feeling it didn't go far enough. There are a great many questions left unanswered that probably could, and should, have been addressed. ( )
  Devil_llama | Jul 22, 2011 |
The attacks of September 11th have spawned a plethora of books about Islam and the Middle East, all trying to explain to the bewildered Westerner how those planes came crashing out of the skies on that bright and fateful autumn day. Occidentalism is one of these books, the authors taking the opportunity of the hightened attention to write a book that, although not officially positioned as such, is an attempt to form a response to the late Palestinian intellectual Edward Said's famous 1978 work: Orientalism.

I read this book largely because I enjoyed another book by Ian Buruma about the history of Japan. Unfortunately, Occidentalism is a far cry from the eloquent and gracious Inventing Japan. Buruma and Margalit succeed in combining their knowledge into one book that does not read as if it was written by two authors, but fail in making a clear and coherent argument to explain Occidentalism (i.e. the way the East views the West). Although they try to bring together the many cultures and nations of the Occident, including Asian history, their analysis is most meaningful only when they write about Islam, which I suspect was what they set out to explain in the first place.

Buruma and Margalit begin by listing the main differences between the West and East, as these are perceived in the eyes of the East: the West is urban - the East is rural; the West is capitalist (see the picture on the book cover) - the East values social values; the West is materialistic - the East is spiritual; and, of course, the West is always evil, out to destroy or at least conquer and subdue the East. Then they set out to show that most of the (mis)conceptions of the East about the West - i.e. Occidentalism - is nothing but a product of the West's (or, more precisely, European) influence and ideas. So basically the East is using Western thought and philosophy and adapt it to its needs, turning against those they perceive as evil, the West.

There are a few problems with this argument. First, the Orient cannot all be lumped into one basket. Arguing that Japanese nationalism, German nazism and Muslim fundamentalism all come from the same roots and share the same view of the West is stretching it a bit. Second, the Occident itself is not homogeneous. For example, the authours bring Jewish Zionism as an example of the "evil West", providing a very simplistic view of Zionism as "Jews buying land with money from Arabs". Third, the authors seem to ignore the widespread ties between West and East - e.g. the US-Japan relationship, or the backing of the Gulf states by the US - as these ties would blow holes into the neat Occident-Orient divide they try to picture.

Despite its flaws, Occidentalism is a good read (and it's a short book), as long as one approaches it as one would approach an essay or a commentary column in the newspaper, not a book that purports to explain the problem of "the West in the eyes of its enemies". ( )
1 vote ashergabbay | Aug 19, 2008 |
Mostrando 1-5 de 7 (seguinte | mostrar todos)
sem críticas | adicionar uma crítica

» Adicionar outros autores (12 possíveis)

Nome do autorPapelTipo de autorObra?Estado
Ian Burumaautor principaltodas as ediçõescalculado
Avishai Margalitautor principaltodas as ediçõesconfirmado

Pertence à Série da Editora

É uma resposta a

Prémios

Tem de autenticar-se para poder editar dados do Conhecimento Comum.
Para mais ajuda veja a página de ajuda do Conhecimento Comum.
Título canónico
Título original
Títulos alternativos
Data da publicação original
Pessoas/Personagens
Locais importantes
Acontecimentos importantes
Filmes relacionados
Epígrafe
Dedicatória
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
For Robert B. Silvers
Primeiras palavras
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
In July 1942, just seven months after the Japanese bombed the American fleet in Pearl Harbor and overwhelmed the Western powers in Southeast Asia, a number of distinguished Japanese scholars and intellectuals gathered for a conference in Kyoto.
Citações
Últimas palavras
Informação do Conhecimento Comum em inglês. Edite para a localizar na sua língua.
(Carregue para mostrar. Atenção: Pode conter revelações sobre o enredo.)
Nota de desambiguação
Editores da Editora
Autores de citações elogiosas (normalmente na contracapa do livro)
Língua original
DDC/MDS canónico
LCC Canónico

Referências a esta obra em recursos externos.

Wikipédia em inglês (5)

"Twenty-five years after Edward Said's Orientalism, a whole field of study has developed to analyze and interpret the denigrating fantasies of the exotic "East" that sustained the colonial mind. But what about the fantasies of "the West" in the eyes of our self-proclaimed enemies? Those remain largely unexamined and, as Ian Buruma and Avishai Margalit argue, woefully misunderstood." "This investigation into the dreams and stereotypes of the Western world that fuel hatred in the hearts of Al Qaeda and its ilk argues that the origins of those dreams lie in the West itself. The anti-Western virus has found a ready host in the Islamic world for a number of reasons, but it is not native there. The West that these jihadis imagine themselves fighting is the same menace that has haunted the thoughts of revolutionary groups since the early nineteenth century. Occidentalism identifies its main oppositions - the timid, soft bourgeois versus the heroic revolutionary; the machine society versus the organically knit one of "blood and soil"; the sterile Western mind, all reason and no soul, versus the "inner life" of the spirit - and provides a new conceptual framework for understanding them, as we must to face the world's most pressing issues."--Jacket.

Não foram encontradas descrições de bibliotecas.

Descrição do livro
Resumo Haiku

Current Discussions

Nenhum(a)

Capas populares

Ligações Rápidas

Avaliação

Média: (3.6)
0.5
1 3
1.5
2 4
2.5 2
3 16
3.5 7
4 32
4.5 3
5 8

É você?

Torne-se num Autor LibraryThing.

 

Acerca | Contacto | LibraryThing.com | Privacidade/Termos | Ajuda/Perguntas Frequentes | Blogue | Loja | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliotecas Legadas | Primeiros Críticos | Conhecimento Comum | 203,212,403 livros! | Barra de topo: Sempre visível