Picture of author.

Bernard Dixon (1938–2020)

Autor(a) de Power Unseen: How microbes rule the world

23+ Works 267 Membros 3 Críticas

About the Author

Trained as a microbiologist, Bernard Dixon has for many years been a science writer, editor, and consultant. He edited the British weekly New Scientist from 1969 to 1979 and now writes regularly for Lancet Infectious Diseases and Current Biology as well as Microbe. He holds an honorary D.Sc. from mostrar mais the University of Edinburgh for his contributions to public debate on scientific issues, and he was appointed an OBE for services to science journalism. He has received the Charter Award of the Institute of Biology, and in 2002 he shared with Steven Rose the Biochemical Society Award "for science communication in the public domain." His previous books include Power Unseen: How Microbes Rule the World, Beyond the Magic Bullet, Magnificent Microbes, and What Is Science For? As well as editing the journal Medical Science Research for 10 years, Dixon has served as European editor for Bio/Technology (now Nature Biotechnology). He has been a member of the board of the Edinburgh International Science Festival and the European Federation of Biotechnology's Task Group on Public Perceptions of Biotechnology. He teaches courses on science communication for bodies ranging from Cancer Research UK to the Universities of Oxford and St Andrews. mostrar menos

Inclui os nomes: Bernard Dixon, Bernard Dixon

Obras por Bernard Dixon

Associated Works

Omni Magazine April 1982 (1982) — Contribuidor — 2 exemplares
New Scientist, 29 August 1968 (1968) — Contribuidor — 1 exemplar
New Scientist, 26 January 1978 (1978) — Reviewer — 1 exemplar
New Scientist, 21 December 1967 (1967) — Contribuidor — 1 exemplar
New Scientist, 21 September 1967 (1967) — Contribuidor — 1 exemplar

Etiquetado

Conhecimento Comum

Outros nomes
Dixon, Dr Bernard
Data de nascimento
1938-07-17
Data de falecimento
2020-10-30
Sexo
male
Nacionalidade
UK
Ocupações
science writer
editor
Organizações
The New Scientist
Prémios e menções honrosas
Healthwatch Award (1999)

Membros

Críticas

Mixed bag. Starting with the title: why "creation"? what's the got to do with science? some notable omissions such as R. Feynman, Sir j Jeans, Carl Sagan. But worse the inclusions are distinctly odd. Wallace's piece struggling surreptitiously to bring God back into the story, a piece written for kids which is hardly classic, from HG Wellls an autobiographical sketch which is amusing but not really science. should really be subtitled "byways in science writing".
 
Assinalado
vguy | 1 outra crítica | Feb 16, 2021 |
A collection of science writings from the seventeenth century to the twentieth. The goal of the editor is to counter the idea that scientists can't write, and that their prose is flat and dull. Some of his selections succeed; others not so much. Overall, it's a mixed bag, and I found some of his choices peculiar. For instance, for Charles Darwin he didn't include anything from Origin, in spite of the fact that one of the most beautiful pieces of science writing ever is the concluding paragraphs to that book; he chose a relatively dull portion of his autobiography instead. Some of the pieces were quite short; those were in many ways the best pieces. There were a few that were way too long, and not particularly interesting. He includes Colin Tudge, who has done some wonderful writing on natural history, so why did he give us a selection on nutrition? Strange. Still, there are some decent pieces in here, and if you want, you can always pick and choose, rather than reading all of them.… (mais)
 
Assinalado
Devil_llama | 1 outra crítica | May 26, 2014 |
This book falls into three parts: a review of the history of medicine, the areas where the prevailing philosophy of try to find a drug for each ill starts to break down and a look at the problems of the developing world. The first part was an excellent potted history, if you are happy to focus on infectious disease, the second thought provoking (given that it was written over thirty years ago but the criticisms and suggestions still seem current) and the third, a bit more optimistic in the sense that there seems to have been more progress that with the previous part.… (mais)
 
Assinalado
edrandrew | Dec 3, 2011 |

You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Estatísticas

Obras
23
Also by
5
Membros
267
Popularidade
#86,454
Avaliação
½ 3.4
Críticas
3
ISBN
52
Línguas
6

Tabelas & Gráficos