![Retrato do autor](https://pics.cdn.librarything.com//picsizes/82/5d/825dc294c46be8765494c7441514330414c5141_v5.jpg)
Arthur Darby Nock (1902–1963)
Autor(a) de Conversion: The Old and the New in Religion from Alexander the Great to Augustine of Hippo
Sobre o Autor
The range of Nock's scholarship is immense. He wrote on early Christianity and the magical papyri, Greek and Roman religion, Zoroastrianism, Mithraism, Gnosticism, and the Hermetic corpus. Nock was not entirely adverse to general statement. He once wrote, "The history of religion is a history of mostrar mais feeling rather than a reason." But consciously, at least, Nock was a "minimizer"; that is, he disliked hasty theorizing, bold generalizations, and speculation. He preferred to rest firmly with the evidence, and he insisted that all evidence needs to be examined and interpreted against the background of its context. What results is a scholar's dream, but it may often be less than satisfying for the general reader. Nock's scholarly papers are wonderful compendia of evidence carefully and critically assessed, at times the only full compendia available on a given subject. (Bowker Author Biography) mostrar menos
Séries
Obras por Arthur Darby Nock
Conversion: The Old and the New in Religion from Alexander the Great to Augustine of Hippo (1961) 148 exemplares, 1 crítica
Sallustius: Concerning the Gods and the Universe (English and Ancient Greek Edition) (2013) 4 exemplares
Essays on religion and the ancient world, Volume I 4 exemplares
Obras Associadas
The Varieties of Religious Experience (1902) — Prefácio, algumas edições — 5,316 exemplares, 36 críticas
Etiquetado
Conhecimento Comum
- Data de nascimento
- 1902-02-21
- Data de falecimento
- 1963
- Sexo
- male
- Nacionalidade
- UK (1902-1936)
USA (1936-1963) - Local de nascimento
- Portsmouth, Hampshire, England, UK
- Locais de residência
- Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Educação
- University of Cambridge (Trinity College)
University of Birmingham (LLD, 1934) - Ocupações
- professor
- Organizações
- Harvard University
Membros
Críticas
Listas
Pode Também Gostar
Autores Associados
Estatísticas
- Obras
- 10
- Também por
- 3
- Membros
- 315
- Popularidade
- #74,965
- Avaliação
- 4.0
- Críticas
- 2
- ISBN
- 15
- Línguas
- 2
- Marcado como favorito
- 1
When Nock wrote, many researchers located the closest parallels with nascent Christianity in the mystery religions. Nock acknowledges some similarities but also stresses crucial differences. There was no recondite teaching reserved for the initiates. Even knowledge of how the central ceremony reserved to the baptized, the eucharist, was conducted was available to outsiders. Above all, Nock notes that initiation into a mystery was expensive. Only those with means need apply. What Christianity offered was available to rich and poor alike. As Nock writes: “It was left for Christianity to democratize mystery” (p. 57)
Two chapters interested me particularly. One dealt with conversion to philosophy. To Nock, this phenomenon was more comparable to conversion in the Christian sense than overtly religious responses. Concerning the latter, Nock makes the helpful distinction between conversion and adhesion. An ancient Roman could participate in a newly introduced form of worship without renouncing his previous cultic practice. As for philosophy, in contrast, its pursuit often involved the change both in worldview and in behavior associated in our minds with religious conversion. Nock underlines the point by showing examples of the vocabulary related to conversion in the New Testament—-metanoia is one example—in accounts of a turn to philosophy.
Even more interesting was the lengthy penultimate chapter, “The Teachings of Christianity as Viewed by a Pagan.” In this, Nock analyses those aspects of the Christian message that shared common ground with widely-held ideas and those that would have seemed unfamiliar and strange. As a result, Nock concludes that “the advance of Christianity stands out as a phenomenon which does not stand alone but has parallels which make its success not wholly incomprehensible” (p. 267).
Despite appearing nearly eighty years ago, I found this book worth reading.… (mais)