Tracy Barrett (1) (1955–)
Autor(a) de Anna of Byzantium
Para outros autores com o nome Tracy Barrett, ver a página de desambiguação.
Séries
Obras por Tracy Barrett
Etiquetado
Conhecimento Comum
- Data de nascimento
- 1955
- Sexo
- female
- Nacionalidade
- USA
- Local de nascimento
- Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Educação
- Brown University (BA ∙ Classics-Archaeology)
University of California, Berkeley (MA ∙ PhD ∙ Medieval Italian Literature)
Membros
Críticas
Listas
Prémios
You May Also Like
Estatísticas
- Obras
- 20
- Membros
- 1,873
- Popularidade
- #13,746
- Avaliação
- 3.4
- Críticas
- 61
- ISBN
- 100
- Línguas
- 2
- Marcado como favorito
- 1
Obviously I enjoy fairy tale re-tellings. I have two shelves dedicated to those sorts of books alone and so many others boxed away waiting to shine forth. Cinderella though isn't a favorite since honestly nothing beats Ella Enchanted for me. That remains almost pitch perfect to me and is book I point to when folk want to know how to re-imagine a fairy tale correctly. (I love the movie Ever After as well, but movie re-tellings are a separate matter entirely).
Barrett's book has much to recommend it. Our main character, Jane (one of the "ugly stepsisters") gives us a focal character who from the start is shown to be working hard. She's trying with everything she has to preserve what her mother sees as their "way of life" and live up to those ideals while still dealing with the every day tasks of having to do everything for a large estate. Tend the animals, clean, cook...Jane (and her sister Maude) do it all just to keep up a pretense of some gentility.
Something had to give and when Isabella ("Cinderella") and her father move in and that something occurs when Isabella's father dies. Its no longer Jane keeping her mother and sister alive, its now Jane keeping her mother, sister and vain useless stepsister alive. Keeping the dreams of one person alive is hard enough, but meeting the demands of two people running around in denial is just awful.
Two problems curbed my enthusiasm for this book, no matter how much I liked Jane and appreciated their budding relationship she was building. The pacing is horribly skewed. Its not that its a slow character driven novel (I love those) its that for 75% of the book its a character driven novel and then the last 25% seemed to remember it had to weave in a whole lot of the original tale.
In short order we have Cinderella's "fairy godmother", the ball, the search for the lady who fits the shoe and the "happily ever after". It felt very rushed and several character turns rang as unrealistic and contrived. Jane fared the best, but I still was sideswiped by her abrupt 180 on how she viewed Isabella's nature.
Meanwhile Jane's mother, Lady Margaret, suddenly has character and a will of her own while Isabella gets over herself long enough to realize she made some big mistakes. In neither case does either character show many glimpses of such traits, they just appear to help save the day at the end. And if we're being technical neither ever admits they were in the wrong. After Jane conceives the solution to their problems the main book ends and in the Epilogue we're told how it all worked out for everyone because of her solution.
I really, truly HATE it when books do that. I don't believe Epilogues should prove the ending. If I read the last page and I don't believe whatever the author wanted me to believe in (the romance, the end of a war, that the sky turned red forever and ever after) I don't want an Epilogue telling me how the ending was correct. An Epilogue should add to my already established belief in the ending. Or set up the continuation of the series itself by moving the focus to a new character. Its a bit like a scientist stating in his research paper that the experiment turned out correctly after only listing the original hypothesis and nothing at all about how he came to that conclusion.
Overall this wasn't a bad book, it just needed to expand on the characters outside of Jane more.… (mais)