Retrato do autor
4 Works 85 Membros 6 Críticas

Obras por Colin Dayan

Etiquetado

Conhecimento Comum

There is no Common Knowledge data for this author yet. You can help.

Membros

Críticas

This is a very thorough look at how our contemporary American penal system is moving toward state-sanctioned torture and returning to a penal system that justifies slavery by calling it "discipline" and "reform." I'll write a more extensive review later, but the book brings court cases from the late 19th century to the present to show how we are moving backward, not forward in terms of how we treat those we deem "criminal" or "enemy combatants."

An excellent read.
 
Assinalado
BreePye | 1 outra crítica | Oct 6, 2023 |
This book is an extremely short yet extremely powerful exposition of US treatment of criminals. Essentially the author convincingly argues that our prison system is an extension of slavery and Abu Ghraib and Gauntanomo are extensions of our existing prison system. Along with the fact that the US is number one in the world in both the absolute number and proportional number of prisoners, the implications of this book are horrifying for anyone who cares about human rights and justice.
 
Assinalado
aront | 1 outra crítica | Jul 25, 2017 |
With Dogs at the Edge of Life by Colin Dayan is an uneven work, essentially by design. The three main topics, each treated separately, include a memoir about the dogs in her life, a discussion/argument about Pit Bulls (or the dogs referred to as Pit Bulls), and a discussion about stray dogs in various parts of the world. The writing itself was fine, perhaps best in the personal section.

I was likely one of many readers who became conflicted reading her section on Pit Bulls. Her argument about the way the breed has been scapegoated by the legal system as well as society in general is both well-researched and clearly presented. When she turns her attention to dog fighting I went from agreement to a surprised sense of disappointment. I found her arguments for legalizing dog fighting to be every bit as well-researched yet seriously flawed in logic. She argues against municipalities killing indiscriminately any dog it believes is bred for fighting (as in the breed is bred for fighting as compared to a breeder breeding for fighting), then turns around and says we should allow dogs to do what they are bred for, thus allow dog fighting. The same arguments about danger and being bred to fight were also leveled at German Shepherds, Dobermans, Rottweilers and other breeds over the past 50 years or so, the common denominator not being the breeding history but the rise and fall in the popularity of each breed among those who like to make dogs mean, whether to compensate for their own shortcomings or for organized dog fighting. A particularly weak attempt at comparison is between cultural value of Spanish bullfighting and Japanese dog fighting. The strawman she sets up claims bullfighting is culturally valuable but dogfighting is not. However, most people who are comfortable with one is comfortable with the other and similarly those uncomfortable with one is uncomfortable with the other. While many of the facts she brings up are indeed important (class difference being a factor in what is acceptable or not, for example) they speak to the need to be more equitable in protecting against the abuse of animals across cultures rather than sinking to the lowest common denominator and advocating for cruelty toward animals.

I think this book is valuable for getting a glimpse into several areas where dogs and humans intersect in contemporary societies. I have to admit to losing about 99% of the respect I had gained for the author during the first part of the book when I read what I clearly believe to be a very week argument that can only serve to encourage more animals to be tortured and abused for the enjoyment of deranged human beings. That respect never returned through the rest of the book in spite of the last part being both interesting and reasonable. Read it critically whether you agree or disagree with her. Decide for yourself the degree to which you find her arguments to be well-formed and logical. But remember that this intellectual gymnastics concerns itself with the lives, torture, abuse and deaths of sentient beings that feel many, if not all, of the basic emotions we do.

Reviewed from an ARC made available by the publisher via NetGalley.
… (mais)
½
 
Assinalado
pomo58 | 1 outra crítica | Apr 4, 2016 |
I found this book to be beautifully written and even poetic at times. Ms. Dayan's love for dogs is something that I could really relate to. Especially her love for a breed that is considered dangerous and even outlawed in some areas. The Staffordshire Terrier does get a bad rap, I agree with Ms. Dayan that the Pit Bull isn't a true Staffordshire Terrier yet it stems from the same foundation.

This book opened my eyes up to some of the injustices that have been done to breeders who simply raise pit bulls. I don't know if I agree with some of the things that are pointed out in the book. I hated the way the police just assumed that this elderly man who had been raising these pit bulls his entire life, who I'm sure raised them to fight when it was legal in that state, but he wasn't doing it now. He was in his twilight years and to have his entire kennel exterminated no questions asked was beyond comprehension. The killed puppies that didn't even have their eyes open. Not the mention the fight to keep himself out of prison. On what basis did the Louisiana government have to do that to him, after all, these years? The answers to that question were ridiculous. He was poor, he was an elderly man of color who wasn't a bother to anyone.

The Michael Vick's case still makes my blood boil, he had to have known about the activities done on his property and they didn't come in and kill all of his dogs, they even tried to rehabilitate some that had been in fights! I understand that it's because of who he was, he got a slap on the wrist and spent some time in a country club prison, then is back out on the football field.

The book did get a bit dull when she went into how the legalities and the legal battles that some of the owners were going through just to keep their dogs. Some of the stories about how dogs have been treated since beginning to time were hard to read. Ms. Dayon points out some of the most interesting facts regarding dogs taken right out of some religious texts that left me dumbfounded. It's very interesting, she really opened my eyes to a lot of facts regarding the history of dogs.

I'm really glad I read this book, I learned a lot about dogs in this book, She referred to some of the same ideology that my trainer uses. I've heard him say the same exact things. So when I look into the eyes of my Belgian Malinois which is a so-called scary breed I see that she's allowing me into her world. I agree with Ms. Dayan that having a powerful dog that allows you into their world is an exceptional feeling, one that you don't want to take for granted. It made me love my dog more if that was possible.

If you are a dog lover or just love history as I do. You would enjoy reading this book, it's really was a true learning experience about humans and canines.

I would like to thank Columbia University Press and NetGalley for providing me with an e-galley of this book for my honest review.
… (mais)
 
Assinalado
sj1335 | 1 outra crítica | Feb 3, 2016 |

Estatísticas

Obras
4
Membros
85
Popularidade
#214,931
Avaliação
½ 4.4
Críticas
6
ISBN
11

Tabelas & Gráficos